.svg){kind=small} | The good article status of this article is being reassessed by the community to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 01:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC) |
 | Tsugaru clan has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tsugaru clan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ideas
editI'd have a single Nihongo (or, if appropriate, Nihongo3) template for the article (or perhaps each section), using Nihongo2 for the rest. No point in multiplying links to Help:Japanese.
This really isn't my area, I'm afraid; and this (plus the usual laziness etc.) deters me from fiddling with it further and perhaps screwing it up. I'll just say that I think sudden unexplained mentions of "clans", "domains", and "daimyo" (sic) could be more inviting -- I've linked to an explanation of the first of these. (Interesting that searching via clan leads you to articles on specific clans of something called "Naruto" before it leads you to any article on real clans. It's also a bit disturbing that the article on daimyo [sic] treats readers to an explanation of what the Japanese word (?) "myo" [sic] means.)
Good luck with the article. -- Hoary (talk) 06:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
GA concerns
editAfter reviewing the article, I am concerned that it no longer meets the GA criteria, particularily because much of the article is uncited. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
edit- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Much of this article is uncited, and the lede is too short to summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom comments. The unsourced information is too much. Also some issues with MOS:OVERLINK. seefooddiet (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- seefooddiet, your !vote has no meaning. You're supposed to give the reassessment time to give traction. 750h+ 09:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- This article definitely needs some love and an update, but overlinking is a trivial and easily fixed complaint. I found a mere two instances of it being broken and simply fixed them (hatamoto is still linked twice, but it's relevant in both places and in greatly spaced sections, so allowed by the OL rules). SnowFire (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)