This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's amazing that there's virtually nothing in here about the political dimension of the work, as if it were just artifice and literary topoi. i think the article on Machiavelli's prince represents something much closer to what's needed. -- chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:4002:1CC8:E6CE:8FFF:FE5E:4F7C (talk) 23:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article leaves me with the strong impression that Erasmus presented largely pagan ideas by clothing them in Christian language. The article implies that Erasmus was intentionally doing this in order that his work might be accepted, rather than honestly attempting to justify his moral claims using Christian epistemology and methods. These are quite interesting claims, but unfortunately, I note that the last few paragraphs cite only Erasmus' own work. Obviously, such rhetorical analysis requires other sources. Daask (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
