Talk:Tŏgwŏn station
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tŏgwŏn station redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 2 May 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was proposed in this section that Togwon Station be renamed and moved to Segil Station.
result: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
Togwon Station → Segil Station – Segil Station is NOT on Songdowon Line, but on Kangwon Line. It is obvious that Togwon Station, between Wonsan and Munchon Station, has been renamed into Segil Station per below:
- From recent map of railway in North Korea, you can find ⊙원산(Wonsan) at the center of the map and you can see that 세길(Segil) is between 문천(Munchon) and 원산. [1]
- From Kokubu, Hayato, 将軍様の鉄道 (Shōgun-sama no Tetsudō, published in 2007), it was 덕원(Togwon) [2]
- From the 2015 video at 11:33, you can see the sign on the platform saying 옥평(Ongpyong)-문천(Munchon)-세길(Segil). [3]
- According to 조선향토대백과, an encyclopedia co-written by South and North Korea, 덕원동(Togwon-dong) was renamed into 세길동(Segil-dong) in 1977. [4] 오모군 (talk) 20:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @오모군: Do you want to merge Togwon Station into Segil Station? What would we do with Segil Station? I wonder what the major contributor User:2Q thinks. Sawol (talk) 05:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- According to Route map on Songdowon Line, so-called Segil Station is on the branch of Songdowon Line. However it is just VIP-only station [5] [6] without any name identified. Also I wonder whether Kokubu(2007) really wrote about Songdowŏn Line on his book on p. 90, as the book was published before Songdowŏn Line was opened officially. 오모군 (talk) 08:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm all for the move. 2Q (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- @오모군 and 2Q: What should the current Segil Station (just VIP-only station) be moved to? Or, should be deleted? Sawol (talk) 06:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- @오모군 and Sawol: "Segil-dong VIP station", perhaps, since we don't know the name, but we know it exists, its location, and its function, a descriptive pagename should do until we learn the actual name, if any. 2Q (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well in kowiki, articles about VIP-only stations or industrial railways are deleted or merged into another articles. However I don't know how enwiki does about those articles. Despite that, I also wonder "Segil-dong VIP station" has a notability for an article as there are so many stations only for Kim dynasty that "Segil-dong VIP station" is just only one of them: [7] --오모군 (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- However, "station" needs to be lowercase, per all previous RM discussions. Dicklyon (talk) 02:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.