Talk:Summoned (film)

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Raydann in topic Requested move 24 September 2023

Requested move 24 September 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Disambiguation page was created at the original title. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 23:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


SummonedSummoned (film) – I doubt that the film is the primary topic over either the magical or legal meanings in the hatnote. I would move this and disambiguate the title between the three. BD2412 T 05:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose as unnecessary WP:OVERPRECISION. There is no other article on WP that would reasonably use the title. This article gets only a handful of views per day, so the hatnote is more than sufficient for the tiny number of readers who might want something other than the film. A dab page would be no more useful than the hatnote, while just inconveniencing those who do want the film that's actually titled Summoned. Station1 (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. The other uses are valid redirects and the film is not primary over those common meanings, so we need a dab page. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nomination and Mdewman6. The one-sentence stub delineating the made-for-TV film should indeed share the proposed Summoned dab page with Summons, Evocation and (under "See also") the Summoning (disambiguation) page. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 23:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support making this a disambiguation page -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Absolutely. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.