Talk:Sheila Jackson Lee

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sheila Jackson Lee article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Houston (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Christianity: Adventist Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Portrait change

Latest comment: 2 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Sorry if I'm unaware but is there a reason the portrait was changed from 116th to 105th Congress? Lowkschwonz (talk) 03:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Usually it's standard that one someone has passed away the portrait is changed to show them in "Their prime" (See Feinstein), however I think having a black and white photo from the 90s is too far away. It should be a official portrait from around the 2010s. In addition it feels extremely disrespectful to change the image only 30 minutes after her death was announced. Whoever changed it should've waited an additional day. TheFellaVB (talk) 03:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. But with this discussion I think we should go ahead and vote. I decided to make another section to do that. Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 04:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Portrait vote

Latest comment: 2 days ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Obviously we need to reach a consensus on what image to use of Jackson Lee. Here are the reasonable options I have found so far. Please feel free to drop more suggestions.

Cast your vote

Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Option E
Option F
Option G

Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 03:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

B or G would get my vote. I think a color photo makes more sense, then E feels perhaps a bit too recent and C + F are very close-up, so that is what my thinking would be to land at B or G. AddMLR (talk) 04:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think G is definitely an excellent portrait since it shows her at a younger age, but also having a picture of her in color + in step with her usual hairstyle. Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Option G completely. Option B would be fine but it feels too zoomed out honestly Lowkschwonz (talk) 06:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I also like G. Could be convinced on the black and white options (D&A). B&E are too zoomed out, C&F are too zoomed in. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 06:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Gaffe - Confederate battle flag should be removed or clarified

Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The "gaffe" is that Jackson, along with 7 other representatives, used a presentation display with 17 stars instead of 13.

This barely seems like a gaffe, and at least it should be noted that Jackson was not (so far as the cited reference tells) the one who introduced the error and that other members missed it too. For example, we don't include this "gaffe" on Hakeem Jeffries's article, though he was also one of the speakers.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/247400-house-dems-display-incorrect-confederate-flag/ Mosi Nuru (talk) 19:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic