Talk:Sakyo Komatsu

Wording

The wording in the article needs to be cleaned up to more standard English. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Merge

I was not aware of the Komatsu Sakyo article when I created this, but I was surprised there had been no previous article. (Now less so as there was). I support the merge as there is some information in this that could be useful there, but I do wonder if I wasted my time creating it.--T. Anthony 10:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Dead

http://jp.reuters.com/article/kyodoMainNews/idJP2011072801000572 :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.38.135.117 (talk) 08:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

ESPY

Was ESPY really first published in 2000? It's entirely possible that the film was based on a then-unpublished novel (I know for certain this is the case with The Runestone because the director told me himself), but this does not seem likely.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The bibliography looks quite a mess. I'll compile from Japanese wikipedia when I have spare time. We'll need a better reference, but in the meantime you might refer to http://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/komatsu_sakyo . --Fukumoto (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sakyo Komatsu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310184546/http://www.centerforbookculture.org/review/02_2_inter/interview_masaki.html to http://www.centerforbookculture.org/review/02_2_inter/interview_masaki.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://jiu.ac.jp/sakyo/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016044120/http://www.nacos.com/komatsu/ to http://www.nacos.com/komatsu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)