Talk:Red Fort

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 114.79.138.79 in topic To add or not to add

Untitled edit

The Mughal royal residence near New Delhi was built as an octagon and surrounded by deep moat. The water flowed into the moat from the the Yamuna river.

it has two important chambers: 1>Diwan-i-khas;and 2>Diwan-i-aam. Diwan-i-khas has the very correct writings : "agar firdaus bar rooe zaminast- haminasto haminasto haminast" meaning if there is paradise on earth,it is here,it is here, it is here 203.192.225.136 09:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)abhinavReply


The above was removed from the front disambiguation page and put here. The material is not appropriate for a disambig but rather for the article about the fort it applies to. Mattisse(talk) 11:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition edit

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 04:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Controversy edit

Controversy resolved and moved to the footnote.--Malaiya (talk) 02:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion for external link edit

The following page could be considered as an external link

http://www.indiapicks.com/Heritage/Red_Fort/Red_Fort-1.htm

red fort was a mugal home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.144.160.216 (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

59.95.161.81 (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)VenkatReply

To add or not to add edit

@Bladesmulti: Bladesmuti I actually undid your edit because you or I may be knowing that on 15 August India achieved independence but all might not be knowing that...so just to be more precise I feel that it should be added there for the convenience of those who are not aware of the date. And if you think that it must not be added there just because there's no citation then I can get a thousand of them and add them there. I hope I was able to put forward my point. Thank you so much Bladesmuti! ^_^ --Tamravidhir (talk) 03:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Every year on 15 August (the day India achieved independence from the British), can be On every 15 August(Independence day of India). Bladesmulti (talk) 04:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Probably the date being Independence Day is more important so emphasize that? Every year on Independence Day (15 August)... Or we could drop the date altogether and readers can click the wikilink if they want to know the exact date. --NeilN talk to me 04:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
To be checked, Every year on Independence Day (15 August) will work. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes the last one will surely work. --Tamravidhir (talk) 04:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
So should we lock it? --Tamravidhir (talk) 04:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes go ahead. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have just slightly changed the sentence and now it is something like this - "Every year on the Independence Day of India (15 August) the Prime Minister of India hoists the national flag ...". I hope this one's fine. --Tamravidhir (talk) 04:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think so yes.@ 114.79.138.79 (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry for spelling your name wrongly Bladesmulti...I kept on writing your name without that "l"...I'm so sorry. --Tamravidhir (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

It is okay. :> Bladesmulti (talk) 05:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Bladesmulti; ^_^...thanks! And I hope that the sentence is also okay. --Tamravidhir (talk) 05:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Red Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Red Fort edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Red Fort's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "books.google.co.in":

  • From Mughal Empire: Mehta, Jaswant Lal (January 2005). Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707–1813. p. 140. ISBN 9781932705546.
  • From Shivaji: Karline McLain (2009). India's Immortal Comic Books: Gods, Kings, and Other Heroes. Indiana University Press. pp. 137–. ISBN 978-0-253-22052-3.
  • From Timurid dynasty: Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707–1813,p.140
  • From Shah Alam II: Delhi, the Capital of India By Anon, John Capper, p.28. "This source establishes the Maratha control of Delhi before the British"

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 04:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Red Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2021 edit

Change the below line:

In the morning, protestors were forced to divert to smaller streets after police kept the agreed rally routes blocked and shut off access to the city. The onward surge of farmers was met with police brutality. 

To : A group of farmers (Khalistani supporters) did not follow the route earlier agreed and tried force entry to the route leading to red fort. When police tried to stop the mob, the mob of so called farmers attacked the security forces with weapons, due to which more than 300 security officials got injured and some were seriously injured and are admitted in hospital.

It was not as per the route agreed by Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM)—the umbrella body of the farmer unions protesting at the Delhi border—with the Delhi Police to take out the marches.

Reference: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/farmer-unions-blame-kmsc-for-digressing-from-route-taking-rally-to-red-fort-101611737434692.html https://www.timesnownews.com/india/article/20-days-before-rday-top-agencies-discussed-sfjs-plan-for-delhi-including-hoisting-flag-at-red-fort/712870 https://www.news18.com/news/opinion/khalistani-supporters-26-january-jallianwala-bagh-delhi-police-3345836.html https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/what-went-wrong-on-republic-day-101611843311646.html https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/objective-of-unruly-farmer-mob-was-to-march-down-rajpath-and-embarrass-india-101611733486257.html Om Prakash Dubey 15:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Please read this "Opposition unites behind farmers; says Delhi siege 'govt conspiracy' to malign them". Tribuneindia News Service. Retrieved 28 January 2021. --Walrus Ji (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Correct the Name Baghel Dingh edit

Baghel Singh's last name is NOT Dhaliwal, but is KarorSinghia. Pb32 (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Not done, His name is Baghel Singh Dhaliwal as per this source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Red fort edit

In reality red fort was made by indian king annngpal tomar in 1052 who was grandfather of Prithviraj Chauhan. and not sahjahan Wikipedia need to correct that . 2405:205:C940:5301:0:0:57F:F8B1 (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes but that was another red fort named Qila Rai PithoraBotu Yadav (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote edit

Please add the following hatnote:

{{about-distinguish|Red Fort in Delhi|Red Fort of Agra|Red Fort, Muzaffarabad}}

Thanks. 2A02:C7C:1018:6E00:58AF:51A1:32:748C (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Done PianoDan (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@PianoDan: Thank you. 2A02:C7C:1018:6E00:3161:5743:507:874B (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@PianoDan: I think, we should also distinguish the Qila Rai Pithora because it is also known as Lal Qila.

Botu Yadav (talk) 11:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

That would be an appropriate addition to the Lal Qila (disambiguation) page rather than a hat note on this page, I think. I'll add it over there. PianoDan (talk) 22:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Truth About Red fort of Delhi edit

Delhi's Red Fort, or Lal Qila, is not only an iconic structure but is synonymous with the city. However, much before the Lal Qila, there was another Red Fort in Delhi called Lal Kot, which was built by Anangpal Tomar in the eighth century. It is the original Red Fort of Delhi. 2409:4055:2E1D:6F2A:0:0:1AC9:211 (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

How red fort is being restored by the archaeological department of india edit

Resdc 146.196.32.136 (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

English edit

Sarojani public school 2402:3A80:1347:88AD:28AF:A254:FA9B:53B4 (talk) 06:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lal qila edit

Lal qila is also known as red fort It's Aanchal here (talk) 09:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply