Talk:Raspberries (band)

Starting Over

The Starting Over link currently points to another group's album. Should I just unlink it? I'm not quite sure what to do in this situation until someone makes that link into an article (or what to do after, for that matter...) BlackTerror 05:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

link now fixed Ohconfucius 10:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Citations & References

See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

POV and Weasel Words

"They had a run of success in the early 1970s music scene with their crisp pop sound" phrasing like this is used throughout this article. 74.4.198.142 (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

To preface I have nothing to do with this article, but the statement you quote is accurate as the band did have success during that time. So I can learn more, how would this phrase need to be restated to be acceptable or more appropriate?THX1136 (talk) 15:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

The first half of the sentence is fine. However, the phrase, "with their crisp pop sound," is subjective. The article should stick to indisputable facts.24.28.30.65 (talk) 14:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Removed the adjective "crisp" since I am assuming it is most responsible for the objection.THX1136 (talk) 14:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

POV and Weasel Words

I agree, the article is terrible. It is not written impartially, words and expression of praise included throughout. The whole thing should be rewritten with just the facts and written from a neutral prospective. By the way I am a fan, I came to read about the band but even I don't like people adding stuff into it like this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevemor909 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Could someone revisit this article with an eye towards this objection. Maybe I'm just missing it, but I'm not seeing the sources for the objections throughout the article. If someone would like to take the time I would also appreciate some "education" in this area as I am willing to learn more on this subject. Thanks!THX1136 (talk) 14:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Raspberries (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324114946/http://ecentral.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F9%2F4%2Fmusic%2F20070904092526&sec=music to http://ecentral.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F9%2F4%2Fmusic%2F20070904092526&sec=music

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Rogue URL

The link for The Rasberries' website is incorrect. www.rasberriesonline.com redirects one to a Vietnamese website. Spskilly (talk) 11:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)