Talk:Rampampam

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articleRampampam has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2021Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rampampam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

My first review for you in a good amount of time; this shouldn't take too long --K. Peake 09:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good!
  • "Lyrically, it discusses a" → "Lyrically, Minelli discusses a" per the other partner bit, but the body does not mention the latter
  • Remove "the German website" introduction to the review and the actual sentence can stay, but create a reception section then write the review with the source at the top because chart positions can be added in there too
  • "gave "Rampampam" a" → "gave the song a"
  • The trending and chart positions should be at the start of the lead's second para
  • "To promote "Rampampam", an accompanying music video" → "For promotion, an accompanying music video" with the wikilink
  • "performed the track on" → "performed the song on"
  • "throughout May and June 2021." → "throughout May and June 2021, respectively."
  • The trending and chart positions can be kept here, but everything in the lead needs to be written out in the body so move the refs to a reception section for the trending and also write out the notable chart positions there
  • "and peaked at number two in" → "while peaking at number two on charts in" since some are different types

Background and composition edit

  • Any specific order for the refs?
  • Minelli pursuing a solo career upon the disbandment is not sourced
  • "prominently being featured on" → "contributing features to"
  • "and on Dave Ramone's" → "and Dave Ramone's"
  • Pipe Ultra Records to Ultra Music
  • "climed to numbers" → "climbed to respective peaks of numbers"
  • Remove "among other territories" per none being sourced outside of Eastern Europe
  • Add Minelli's quote on working with Viky Red
  • Wikilink basslines
  • "came up with its" → "came up with the"
  • Where does the source actually mention an instrumental?
  • "to a shooting a gun." →"to shooting a gun."
  • Can you find a source mentioning which partner gets the revenge?
  • Move the release info to being in a section below since it is not correct flow having this directly after comp
  • The download/streaming parts should be directly before "as a single" and the record label should be just prior to the date

Release and reception edit

  • Create this section by having the release info first, then any review(s) and commercial performance at the end

Music video and promotion edit

  • Wikilink music video
  • Remove "for "Rampampam"" since accompanying implies it is for the song already
  • "while Paul Tatcu was hired as" → "while Paul Tatcu served as"
  • "on a red chair watching" → "on a red chair, watching"
  • "and yielded in more than" → "yielding in more than"

Track listing edit

  • Either remove wikilink on Filatov & Karas or add a Russian wikilink

Charts edit

Weekly charts edit

  • Should both the Czech Republic charts be kept or only the singles one?
  • The archived ref for Germany Download will not load up to number 77
  • I don't think Romania Radio and TV Airplay charts should be kept when the main Airplay one is there

Monthly charts edit

  • Add the month next to year in brackets and if one is for a different month, then create a separate table to be clear

Certifications edit

  • Good

Release history edit

  • Good

See also edit

  • Good

References edit

  • Copyvio score looks superb at 23.6%!!!
  • I am providing a link to the revision at the time of my review, as the refs will be switched around
  • Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 3
  • Pipe lescharts.com to Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique on ref 8
  • Pipe Offizielle Deutsche Charts to GfK Entertainment charts on ref 9
  • iTunes Store → Apple Music on refs 16-19, plus only wikilink on the first citation of them all and why are there no language parameters for releases like Italy?
  • WP:OVERLINK of YouTube on refs 23-26
  • WP:OVERLINK of Tophit on refs 29, 45, 47, 48, 49 and 50
  • Add the language parameter for ref 30
  • Remove wikilink on Official German Charts for ref 33
  • Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 39

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed; not too large an article! --K. Peake 14:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  •  Fail since two weeks have passed following the review and there's been no response whatsoever, even after I send the user a reminder message. --K. Peake 09:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Kyle Peake: Hey there, sorry for the huge delay, but I've been very busy in real life, and this is the first time I was really able to make more edits here on Wikipedia. I have solved all your issues, apart from:
    • I don't think Minelli's solo career needs a link since it's evident that otherwise, she wouldn't release this solo single. Also, it is mentioned that she signed a record deal with Ultra Records etc. I think this is enough to make up for it.
    • Which quote of hers working with Viky Red do you mean?
    • She mentions that it was an instrumental when interviewed by the Lithuanian Delfi. It's a video.
    • Sadly I cannot find a ref for whom gets the revenge. It's Minelli in the music video, but for the song itself, I'm not sure.
    • I think that both Czech charts should be kept since they reflect different aspects: Czech radio and Czech sales/streaming. They are taken into consideration for other articles too.
    • The same goes for the Romanian charts. The spilt charts are two legitimate charts as well, compiled by Media Forest.
  • Hmm, the website not loading might be an issue on your end. It loaded for me, but it took really long, I have to admit.
    • I have never seen months being added to the table. Do you have an example?

Sorry again for the delay... is there any chance we can resume the reviewing process on this article? Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cartoon network freak I thought you were not going to respond because not only had it been ages, but you'd even been active since the review. The quote on working with Viky Red is one where she commented about how they collaborated with each other, also the monthly charts part refers to the sub-section... add the month(s) in brackets before 2021. --K. Peake 11:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Kyle Peake   Done Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Cartoon network freak  Pass now, I only split the monthly charts into two tables and good work on your part despite this being nearly a month after the review! --K. Peake 09:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply