Talk:RIP (disambiguation)

Untitled

---

Do we need a link to rip (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIP) ? -SDF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.171.57 (talk) 10:55, 24 November 2005‎ (UTC)

---

Edit Reversion

This page may need protection if it gets vandalized again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.129.253.90 (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2007‎ (UTC)

I believe that RIP protocol needs to be in top of the list after the acronym rest in peace. I think is more important that albums names and other things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhcpy (talk • contribs) 19:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The english translation of Requiescat In Pace is accurate in context and has been the accepted translation for the lifetime of it's normal use in modern English. The 'often misinterpreted' portion is inaccurate as liturgical Latin is often modified during it's translation into the vernacular for clarity of meaning in context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.96.168 (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Combine with Rip

I'd like to combine this page with the Rip page. Any comments on that? --Nneuman (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• Oppose RIP and rip are distinctly separate, with the former being an initialism and the latter a word. --Trevj (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 21 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Mahveotm (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

---

RIP → RIP (disambiguation) – Seems that the capitalized acronym RIP should redirect to Rest in peace as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. Steel1943 (talk) 01:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Makes sense. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support, since there is an article Rest in peace then of course this well-known acronym should redirect to it. Common sense and common name would apply to make it the primary for the topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support Makes perfect sense._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Common sense really. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support. This is a very rare case of a three-letter acronym having a primary topic. bd2412 T 14:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT and WP:COMMONNAME. CookieMonster755✉ 17:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.