Talk:Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction – Kanpur section

(Redirected from Talk:Mughalsarai–Kanpur section)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Toddy1 in topic Official name
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mughalsarai–Kanpur section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mughalsarai–Kanpur section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Need to move the article to keep the realistic name

edit

need to change the article name to match the respective station names Anubhavklal (talk) 18:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

It depends on the city name, similar to Allahabad and its related articles. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
You mean the common name Prayagraj? Anubhavklal (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes. The names of most of the related articles were changed/moved when the consensus was reached to move the main article Allahabad to Prayagraj. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
So if nobody has commented on it so far, does it mean consensus is arrived? Or do we need to wait for some more time? Anubhavklal (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Anubhavklal: No its not, an RfC requires 30 days, besides you haven't open a proper move request here. I believe it would be necessary. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
How to open a proper move request here? Can someone do it pls Anubhavklal (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Do how you did here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
As per Wikipedia guidelines, it is 7 days (not 30 days) Anubhavklal (talk) 07:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
"Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will enact the request. If not, the request may be re-listed to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion closed as "no consensus". Time depends on the consensus if reached, if not then re-listed. If an WP:RfC is required in the case of continued dispute, it still requires 30 days to end. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 1 July 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moed to Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction – Kanpur section per rough consensus — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


Mughalsarai–Kanpur sectionPt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Jn - Kanpur section – ref discussion on Talk page... Anubhavklal (talk) 18:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I managed to find an official document that uses "Kanpur - Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay (CNB-DDU) section" as the name of this section: Indian Railways, Detailed Project Report of KAVACH Works in CNB-DDU Section of North Central Railway, 2021 A Google search appeared to show a second document, but it turned out to be another URL for the same document.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have changed my mind.
As far as I am aware, there is no current commonly-used English name for this railway section. We know of a name used in an official document for this section. There is also merit it retaining the current article name because it uses the commonly-used English names for towns at either end of the section, and is therefore is easy to understand.
This RM was opened at the same time as the main article discussion. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support move to Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction – Kanpur section - per WP:CONSISTENT, in particular WP:CONSUB. Since the discussion on parent page was closed as moved, this also warrants a move. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 16:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit

@Anubhavklal: I don't get it why you keep changing the target article. Last time you tried to unilaterally move it to "Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Jn –Kanpur section", now "Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Jn - Kanpur section". Not only it is difficult to verify which version to check for, it looks like you are trying to game the system. Stick to one version only. Your other move requests are also like that and so was your moves last few days. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not clear what you mean by "target" article. Is there a rule that one can make only one request at a time? Should we not work together to make entire Wikipedia useful? Anubhavklal (talk) 19:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Anubhavklal: Target article is name you are suggesting. You are changing it often, as if choosing from a list. The article will be moved to a single 'name space' that you mention above, not forked into multiple versions of it. And what's with the − "Should we not work together to make entire Wikipedia useful"? I see this in most of your comments? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
We need to work together because WP:CON is required. Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinions. Anubhavklal (talk) 19:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Who says consensus is not required, but you need to be specific. Moving pages is a complex process. Very well, I check for this specific version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Now it is 7 days and only one person has objection. So how to reach consensus? @admin
Or do we need WP:ARB ?
. Anubhavklal (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
So which of the two users who raised objections does not count as a person?-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your comments didn't appear like objection. But if it was, of course both should be counted. Anubhavklal (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Official name

edit

HI Toddy1, I didn't check your comments on "Kanpur - Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay (CNB-DDU) section" above. Perhaps we need to have another RM since that's the official name, after some time maybe? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Maybe.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply