Talk:Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram

Move

I do not understand why some people can not understand, Datu muedzul Lail Tan Kiram was crowned in 1974 under Memo Order 427 as Raja Muda, that is fact, please visit www.royalsultanateofsulu.org and under section Raja Muda you will find the certified opy from Philippine Foreign Minsitry confirming it, so I will move it back. Tahnk you for your attention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RDAndrew (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do sign your comments. And no, you didn't move it back. You just copied the content. That can't be. There's a process for this. Request for a page move at WP:RM so that it can go under closer scrutiny if it should really be moved back. The page history of this article must be kept that's why you cannot just copy it to the old one. When a requested move is done, the old title ("Raja ...") is deleted so that this page can be freely moved along with its history. Please do understand. Moray An Par (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Dear Moray An Par, please explain me what has happened now? Can I move it back as I have provided legal documents which confirm my statement and nobody has not discussed it here? RDAndrew (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

The move was denied by an administrator, so no you cannot move it. You may however use the title in the first mention of his name. Subsequent mentions must only use his surname per our manual of style. Though it may be proven through the evidence you provided that Muedzul has the legal right to use the titles, you should only discuss it in the article proper and not use the titles in every mention of his name. Moray An Par (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

See WP:HONORIFIC. Moray An Par (talk) 11:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Rajamuda.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Rajamuda.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

I do not understand why someone needs to delete his image, as it belongs to Royal Archives of Sulu and I have all rights to display it here. This image shows official coronation what took place in 1974! Please if you dont have any idea of Sulu history then I can be helpful and provide documents. --unsigned comment by RDAndrew. Moray An Par (talk) 09:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

This is not the page to discuss that. See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rajamuda.jpg. Moray An Par (talk) 09:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. No case has been made for ignoring MOS:HONORIFIC which seems to apply here. Also a reading of WP:OFFICIAL might be helpful. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram → Raja Muda Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram of Sulu – I am requesting this on User:RDAndrew's behalf. I do not have any strong opinions regarding the title. I expect that the two persons (RD and User:JL 09) most involved in this article will present their rationales for and against this move. Moray An Par (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Dear Moray An Par, thank you RDAndrew (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

I hope I did understand you correctly and this is the correct place where to held the discussion:D.

Please take a note that I have added three certified copies of documents to the Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram's WP page. They all are certified by Philippine Foreign Ministry and they confirm Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram's birth right to use the title: Raja Muda as stated per Memo Order 427. The question is not about Sovereignty and also Raja Muda Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram of Sulu is not a subject by International Law, but as I mentioned previously Philippine Government has recognised office of the Sultan of Sulu after 1915 and also office of the Raja Muda.

Therefore I request to move Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram article back to Raja Muda Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram of Sulu. User: JL 09 is constantly trying to explain that I am wrong but at the same time he does not have any documents to prove he is right and therefore his arguments are not strong enough and should be considered as null. RDAndrew (talk) 18:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111006041336/http://www.royalhouseofgeorgia.ge/order-eagle/order-distinguished-members to http://royalhouseofgeorgia.ge/order-eagle/order-distinguished-members
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130302033321/http://malaysiakini.tv/ to http://malaysiakini.tv/#/video/24983/multiple-sultans-of-sulu-making-claims-for-sabah.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140904034528/http://www.royalsultanateofsulu.com/ to http://www.royalsultanateofsulu.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20140827203754/http://www.royalsultanateofsulu.com/hm-ampun-sultan-mued-i/ to http://www.royalsultanateofsulu.com/hm-ampun-sultan-mued-i/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928100805/http://www.asiaamerica.org/gallery/december_2003.html to http://www.asiaamerica.org/gallery/december_2003.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)