Talk:Mike He

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Drmies in topic Requested move

Move? edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Mike He Jun XiangMike He

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Inappropriate for encyclopedia edit

Someone tagged this article as containing material not suitable for an encyclopedia. They didn't bother to post here and say what it is. Comments, anyone? D O N D E  groovily Talk to me 04:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I thought it was obvious. In particular the phrase "with his attractive figure and handsome looks" doesn't belong in an encyclopedia unless it is a direct quote. Parts of the article are written in a conversational fashion from the perspective of a fan. Taiwantaffy (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok. I re-worded. The tag uses the word "content", when it's actually the writing style that was inappropriate. Since all the content seemed the right kind of material, I wasn't even thinking about the writing style. (I popped into the history and saw that it was even worse yesterday). As long as I'm missing those kinds of issues, I will never gain immediate popularity with my hot figure and super hot looks :)
BTW, why is IMDB considered unreliable? D O N D E  groovily Talk to me 13:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


Requested move edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Mike HaMike He – His name is Mike He not Mike Ha. A user moved the page from Mike He in April 2012, now there are 2 entries (Mike He and Mike Ha). Mike Ha should be deleted after the move. User:173.70.45.115 05:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment if this cannot be moved back to the main location, it should be restored to Mike He Jun Xiang for history attribution purposes, it should exist at a proper name form. -- 70.24.245.16 (talk) 23:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment the WP:CFORK currently at "Mike He", can be moved to He Jun Xiang and redirected to this article, when it is restored to its proper location, since this article contains the bulk of the edit history. -- 70.24.245.16 (talk) 23:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • It goes beyond content forking at the current article Mike He, it was a blatant copy and paste (copyright violation). I guess someone wanted to restore it after an user moved the article in April. I reverted it back to a redirect. The edits between the first edit and my edit is mostly editorial and the article was copy-pasted at the second edit, so... yeah... the article history is insignificant at the current Mike He article. --Cold Season (talk) 21:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. The proposed title is the most common spelling of his name while the current title is the least common. —  AjaxSmack  05:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. He not Ha In ictu oculi (talk) 05:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as He is the common name. --Cold Season (talk) 04:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.