This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Michael Jon Hand is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
I've added Kwitny, an important source on Hand's background and activities. Kwitny conflicts in several places with McCoy's 1991 account, and it looks mostly like Kwitny had it right and McCoy got these details wrong (such as the date Hand allegedly worked for the CIA). If there are any comments or corrections to these changes, please put up a note here.
I've also removed a long quote from John Jiggens's dissertation, which was not integrated into the text, and related to what was really one of the bank's activities. I'll go back when I have time and make sure relevant information is in the Nugan Hand article, but I don't see the point in duplicating bank activities here. Duplication of personal details of Hand's life is unavoidable, unfortunately, and I've added material from the bank story that relates the claims of Hand never being seen again (not true). Rgr09 (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
The Propublica article you cited says "One [Australian] investigation found links between Hand and the CIA, while another did not." This is poorly put; the investigations were into Nugan Hand Bank, not just Hand. There were three investigations; the final one, the Royal Commission of Inquiry conducted by Donald Stewart, found the Nugan Hand Bank was not linked to the CIA.
This is obviously different from saying that Michael Hand was never employed by the CIA. Kwitny's book describes what he found about Hand and the CIA; it is phrased very carefully, no doubt for strong legal reasons. The article incorporates the statements Kwitny made. Hand is still alive, so the article is subject to Wikipedia's BLP guidelines. I think any stronger statement would be a BLP problem. Rgr09 (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Looking through this article again, I see a lot of problematic passages. I put this article aside because I didn't have access to the reports of the Australian investigations. If there is doubt, maybe some of this other stuff should go as well. Rgr09 (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
The Propublica article also states, "The CIA has previously denied that it had any links to Hand." That leads me to think there has been some public statement on the part of the CIA, but I have not been able to find it. To me, there is a difference between "working for" (which implies regular employment or a contract) and "working with" (which could mean various others things); however, the CIA's denial suggests that they claim he had nothing to do with them. Of course that is different than Hand knowing people who working with the CIA or having some sort of working relationship with ex-CIA officers/officials. I haven't read Kwitny, so I don't know what contradicts this. - Location (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Given our similar discussion in Talk:Nugan Hand Bank, I guess we might be at loggerheads on this; however, I think we should only cite Butt to the extent that his views have been cited in mainstream sources per WP:REDFLAG. - Location (talk) 15:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Regardless, the way this is dealt with in the article is out of date and wrong. There is no reason to use a media report of what Butt said rather than cite Butt directly.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Michael Jon Hand (aka Michael Jon Fuller) was deceased in 2020; factual and may be easily verified. Hand Aka Fuller was (in part) protected by the CIA for his criminal allegiance with that criminal agency. I'd add that to the page but no doubt some Deep State actor for the Axis of Evil here will remove it. :) Montoya44 (talk) 03:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply