Wikipedia

Talk:Mike Mondo

(Redirected from Talk:Michael Brendli)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleMike Mondo has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starMike Mondo is part of the Spirit Squad series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 27, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Comment

edit

The majority of the internet has Mike's last name listed wrong. I asked somebody who knows him personally (for their privicy I don't want to disclose more than that) after having my suspicions and they confirmed it should be Brendli, not Brenley. I think this claim can be backed up if you do a search for "Mike Brendli", as this name is listed in some earlier results on the web. T

His name is Mike Brendli. Do a search on myspace.com for the name and you will come up with his genuine page.

WikiProject class rating

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Michael Brendli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Toolbox

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: one dead link tagged (ref #3 [1] is a blank page

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The prose meets the "reasonably good" standard and the article complies sufficiently with the MoS.
    Personal life: teh sentences need to be consolidated into one paragraph.
    I made few copy edits, mostly for spelling.[2]
    Combined paragraph. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    As mentioned above ref #3 [the rap sheet) is just a blank page. This presents a problem for the citation about his arrest and bail. that statement absolutely has to be cited.
    It seems as though his record has been clean. I made a search and didn't find anything. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Well, if it can't be sourced that statement needs to be removed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    I'll let Nici decide on that, since she expanded the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    I understand your position, I did email Nici, who it appears is away from Wikipedia for a while. I am going to comment out that sentence as per WP:BLP guidelines. Then it can be re-added if sources are found. BLP criteria are quite clear on unsourced contentious material. I have also commented out all instances of <ref name="arrest">. I accept the details about weight and height on good faith.–– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    References supplied appear to be reliable and support the cited statements. All statements are sufficiently well cited.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    I guess that there isn't much more about his personal life to be found.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Two images used, both correctly tagged and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    OK, just a couple of points raised above, on hold for seven days. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    OK, as the contentious unsourced material has been commented out, I am happy to pass this as a Good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. EdJohnston (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Michael Brendli → Mike Mondo – He is using this name currently in OVW and ROH. He never used his real name. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Support "Mike Mondo" yields 4 results in Google News, "Mikey" "Spirit Squad" 1, "Michael Brendli" 0. Starship.paint (talk) 09:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mike Mondo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Mike Mondo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mike_Mondo&oldid=1209135542"