Talk:MICROSCOPE

Requested move 4 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 14:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

---

MICROSCOPE (satellite) → MICROSCOPE – no disambiguation needed. Can't move myself as the target is on the title blacklist. mfb (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

• @Mfb and Randy Kryn: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
• This would be controversial, per microscope. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Oppose - the title is too ambiguous with Microscope. Interstellarity (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

• Support Per WP:DIFFCAPS, particularly the MAVEN example, which is exactly analogous to this one._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
• Support. Capitalisation is enough to differentiate. JIP | Talk 11:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
• Support per ZXCVBNM, how could this be controversial, the difference is very distinct so why would someone use ALL CAPS to search for a generic term? Note that there is also MicroScope that is far more subtle but still probably passed DIFFCAPS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.