Luis Ibáñez was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm not willing to do a full review of this article but upon inspection I realised there were a few spelling mistakes and such in this article. While I'm sure the reviewer wouldn't fail an article on them, it's worth having a thorough scan. Spiderone 09:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. I expect to post a full review within two days and will notify the nominator then. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
The article is very poorly written, needs a thorough copy-edit throughout. You may be able to enlist help from the WP:Guild of copyeditors. Currently this is a long way away from meeting critirion #1 of the WP:GACR.
The lead does not fully summarise the article, see WP:LEAD
ON hold for seven days for copy-editing. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well there have been a few minor edits but nothing resembling a full copy-edit and no response from the nominator, so I will not be listing this at this time. When it has been copy-edited, take it to WP:Peer review and when any points from that have been addressed, re-nominate at WP:GAN. Please check the WP:GACR and make sure that any future nominations meet all of the criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
b (citations to reliable sources): 
