This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
We have three very out of date pages which require considerable work to get them all up to scratch and then regular updating. I would suggest that we merge them all here and then move this page to List of Kent County Cricket Club records. Some elements can be reduced as required - the w/l record against each opponent for example - and focus can be placed on the records themselves. Thoughts? Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Having looked around some other counties and had a think, these are probably better simply cut down more in line with those for Somerset - which seem to have had some significant discussion over the years. I'll go with that for now and see - any comments at all? Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
