Talk:Latin Psalters

Apologia pro versione piana

I removed the following from the Versio Piana section. It is stating, as fact, an implied and biased informal point of view, without any sources or alternative viewpoint. (See [[1]]) Mmortal03 06:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Its defenders contend that if you are going to pray to God, if you are not using the Hebrew original you are supposed to use the translation that is closest to the Hebrew, and if it is Latin, you should use the noblest style of the Latin language, which is that of Cicero. God deserves no less. Discoveries through the many centuries have made it possible to have such a "state-of-the-art" Latin version which is the Versio Piana, that of Cardinal Bea, published by order of Pope Pius XII.

Fascinating discussion

A fascininating discusion on this topic is taking place here. Rwflammang (talk) 16:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Versions

This section really needs to be prefaced by an overview. Sparafucil (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Latin Psalters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080508233358/http://www.kellerbook.com:80/LANGUA~1.HTM to http://www.kellerbook.com/LANGUA~1.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Missing schema of Pius V

The schema can be found at http://www.gregorianbooks.com/gregorian/www/www.kellerbook.com/Foursch.htm or http://www.gregorianbooks.com/gregorian/www/www.kellerbook.com/PRE-19~1.HTM , in case anyone wants to add it to the page. --31.17.251.109 (talk) 15:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

This is now done, using one of these sources and also another. Simplex~enwiki (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

"Psalter (Roman Catholic)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Psalter (Roman Catholic) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 4#Psalter (Roman Catholic) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)