Talk:Kyoko Koizumi

(Redirected from Talk:Kyōko Koizumi)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 21 November 2022

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. The discussion was started and contributed to by abusive socks of a permanently blocked editor, and is too affected by sockpuppetry to determine consensus. Cúchullain t/c 17:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


– My evidence: The official website and blog for Koizumi uses Kyoko. Similarly, the official website for Yakusho uses Koji. The Google books results are, for Koizumi, 365 for Kyoko versus five for Kyōko, a ratio of 73 to one, and for Yakusho, 1730 for Koji versus 32 for Kōji, a ratio of 54 to one. The policy I appeal to is WP:JTITLE: "Use the form personally or professionally used by the person (such as on their official website or official social media profile), if available in the English/Latin alphabet" and "Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world". (These two individuals are unrelated people. I am grouping them together because the arguments and evidence are virtually identical in nature. I apologize if this is inappropriate.) Mysterious Island (talk) 01:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Kyōko Koizumi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 November 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 02:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


Kyōko KoizumiKyoko Koizumi – A previous attempt to move this page was turned down because of who requested it and supported themselves with sockpuppets. However, I believe the reason for the move is correct.

According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles#Personal names articles about Japanese people should be titled after "the spelling and name order … most commonly used in reliable, third-party English-language sources (encyclopedias, newspapers, magazines, academic books, academic journals, etc.)" and if there is not enough written in English for that to be clearly determined, it should be "the form personally or professionally used by the person, if available in the English/Latin alphabet".

Her name is spelt "Kyoko Koizumi", without a macron, by these third- and first-party sources alike:

The order is not consistent, but the "Kyoko Koizumi" order appears to dominate. Tempjrds (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. NasssaNsertalk 01:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose some readers might want to know how to pronounce the name correctly. It does no harm to anyone to know how the name is pronounced. きょうこ not きょこ. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nomination. Names transliterated into English from languages that do not use the Latin alphabet should only employ accents and diacritics if that is how the WP:COMMONNAME is rendered in each respective instance. As indicated in the numerous submitted citations, this name is not rendered into English via use of diacritics. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 02:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support based on the sources provided it appears that the proposed title appears to be the WP:COMMONNAME and I don’t see the suggestion that keeping the current title helps people pronounce the subjects name correctly is a strong enough reason not to change the title.--65.92.162.81 (talk) 04:33, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per WP:ABOUTSELF (and also common name, sure). The social media sites like YouTube support macrons just fine; if she isn't using them, that means she prefers a Romanized form without them and deserves deference for that choice. SnowFire (talk) 21:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.