A fact from Kristian Vilhelm Koren Schjelderup Jr. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 472 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Mr. Schjelderup's being "noted as a prominent liberal theologian" needs to be further sourced, and in general, this article needs more than one source for verifiability from reliable sources. - CobaltBlueTony™talk 16:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know it does, and that one ref I found isn't the best way to do it. But I'm at work and can't check LexisNexis. Putting a notability tag up is probably best. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 17:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago13 comments3 people in discussion
A mention of a foreign language biography with no page numbers, references or links -- or even ISDN numbers -- is not even a source, much less a reliable source. Please do not add unsourced content again. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 22:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I think removal of a large chunk of text about a deceased person, text which is not controversial or potentially damaging, for the reason which you provide is quite inappropriate. The text should be reinstated and tagged with a reference request. That is quite sufficient. __meco (talk) 10:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree, it's ... well. It has no foundation in policy as far as I know. Punkmorten (talk) 14:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
So you're fine with an entire page of completely unreferenced content that can't be verified or even found anywhere? Go ahead and restore it. Don't expect me to, however. I've already tried to get some kind of reference in here and I'm tired of dealing with an author that describes adding tags for reference requests as vandalism. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 15:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've restored it. __meco (talk) 15:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
If no references are found in a week, it's going to AfD, as it completely fails WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:N. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 17:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have sent requests for information to the Royal Court of Norway via the national website to confirm the most glaring of the unsupported claims. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 20:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
What does the Royal Court have to do with this? Punkmorten (talk) 21:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
The Royal Court keeps a list of all appointments to the Order of St. Olav. If I can confirm that much is accurate and verified, then I can assume the rest is good. If that comes back as untrue, then I can proceed to start trying to verify the other claims in the article. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 22:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is there any particular reason why in the first place you doubted the content of this article? After all, Wikipedia has hundreds of thousands of other articles similarly unreferenced claiming relatively innocuous facts. __meco (talk) 07:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
The original author has done some, shall we say, factually challenged edits before, such as on David Irving. And whenever I do a search on someone and can't find a single reliable source, I typically hold that the article doesn't belong on WP. If there was even a good source that backed all this up, that'd be the end of it. But even on the Norweigian wp there isn't. -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 19:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I added the sources. Happy Christmas, war is over. Punkmorten (talk) 09:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
The Royal Court confirms he was awarded the Commander of St. Olav, personally, at the hands of the king. And the article is sourced, yay! (wanders off) -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 14:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"In 1937 he founded Nansenskolen." Except that Nansenskolen has no mention of that, says it was founded in 1938, and the only founders I can find are Anna Henriette and Anders Wyller. Any links to back this up? -- ₪ Amused ReposeConverse! 22:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply