| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Katrina Leung be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editWhen I indicated she was a spy in the first draft of this article, though, I meant for the FBI- a fact which is not in doubt. -- jleybov — Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 22 April 2003
It maybe worth a discussion to remove the "political conisderation" section since it gives only single point of view with no conservative voice in dissent — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.49.224 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 4 January 2006
I remove the "political discussion section". It's nothing but a one-sided political analysis and adds nothing substantive to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.5.152 (talk • contribs) 04:40, 23 March 2006
I too removed the politacal discussion section - same reason as above - MZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.228.222.112 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 24 May 2006
Someone ought to go through the DoJ report about the case, since it is probably the most definitive account of the case (the press reporting here has some errors in it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.93.105 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 9 September 2006
This link wasn't used in the article and doesn't appear to contribute anything important. 06:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Leung's Campaign Contributions. Katrina Leung's Federal Campaign Contribution Report. www.newsmeat.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temporaluser (talk • contribs)
Affair
editWhy does this article not mention the affair between her and Agent Smith? Sephiroth storm (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
How can Leung's passport be from ROC?
editIf Leung was born in 1954 in mainland China, how can she hold ROC passport since PRC was already in control of her birthplace well before that time? If her parents brought her to Taiwan or other places under ROC control, which enables her to get a passport from ROC, this is not mentioned at all. The point is, does she have a valid passport from ROC in the first place, or was it a fake? The other possibility was she was born and raised in mainland China, then came to US. --Happyseeu (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Katrina Leung
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Katrina Leung's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "latimes":
- From Federal Bureau of Investigation: Jalon, Allan M. (2006-04-08). "A Break-In to End All Break-Ins". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2006-06-06.
- From Caroline Leonetti Ahmanson: Mary Rourke, Caroline Leonetti Ahmanson, 83; Philanthropist Supported the Arts, The Los Angeles Times, July 23, 2005
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)