Untitled

edit

Unsupported change of initial name convention introduced, so the cases are reverted to initial condition" Please note that the accurate use of Korean last name "정" is Chung. For example Korean Politician Chung, Dong-young. Late President of Hyundai Corporation Chung, Ju-yung. The Jeong is the "Revised Romanization" of Chung. The document is modeled in concurrence to the global convention of Korean name, please do not change the name convention unless you can prove it is 100 percent correct, Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newone310 (talkcontribs)

The accepted romanization in South Korea at present IS the revised romanization! Teemeah 편지 (letter) 13:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jung Dong-ha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jung Dong-ha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disputed inline "Supported range" and "Resonating"

edit

With respect to the disputed inline "Jung has over 3 octaves vocal range of F#2 ~ C#6[citation needed] and been praised by many vocal critics for his wide supported range and the ability to resonate notes without tension.[citation needed]":

Not only is there no citation used, the term "supported range" does not exist in vocal pedagogy and is a priori nonsensical and contradictive. You won't be able to find a reliable source (anyone with education in vocal pedagogy, such as vocal coaches, voice teachers, professors, scientific evaluations, text books etc) that uses such a term.

Same applies to the claim that he is known for his "ability to resonate notes without tensions": Not only is it not sourced, and the used language non-scientific, the content is nonsensical. Every sound "resonates". And every "note" "resonates" as it inter alia naturally passes through several resonators, it's not scientifically possible to sing without resonance. The amount of resonance can vary though, however, only gola aperta singing, as used in opera, produces really big resonance, and Jung does not apply a gola aperta technique, he is a contemporary singer. Also, you can't sing with "no tension" at all, you can only sing without unhealthy tension. I agree that Jung has a healthy singing technique, but the used terminology is non-scientific and basically incorrect (and additionally unsourced). Also, the claim that being able to "resonate notes without tension" is something notable is a little weird, as tension does not increase (or "create") resonance. Space increases resonance (by increasing the space the sound has to reverberate by increasing the space in the vocal tract by dropping the larynx and raising the soft palate (which is btw something Jung does not do). It's not more difficult to "resonate" with less tension than with more tension.

I'm not a person who likes to remove content added by others, and I fully respect this talented singer, but at least a tag is definitely needed here. Kind regards, Stimmbildung (talk) 10:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply