Talk:Japan Tobacco

Latest comment: 7 years ago by AprilInParis in topic Tokyo lawsuit

Removed section

edit

Took out a section that incorrectly refered to Reynolds owning all JT brands including Mild Seven.

Fair use rationale for Image:Mild Seven logo.png

edit
 

Image:Mild Seven logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pianissimo

edit

Is this one of theirs? Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Japan Tobacco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo lawsuit

edit

The article as currently edited has a major discrepancy: it states that seven plaintiffs flied suit against JT and three died whilst it was being litigated, leaving six, which is arithmetically impossible. Does someone have access to the real story? Did two intervenors have leave of the court to replace the deceased plaintiffs, or is this just a mistake? 2600:1004:B16E:DE84:4915:2828:D55B:580E (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Good math. Levin (2016)[1] and Feldman (2001)[2] both report on the 1998 Tokyo lawsuit. Maybe the answer there or in their sources. Levin also has lots on the Yokohama 2005 case and the Yasui Taxi Driver 2008 case, so maybe close to up to date for these things. AprilInParis (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy (2016), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741874
  2. ^ American Journal of Comparative Law (2001), https://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/eafeldma/workingpapers/49AmerJofCompLaw679.pdf