Talk:Intersectionality

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intersectionality article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 180 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism High‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Discrimination High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Triple oppression on 14 October 2018. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was No consensus.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Atewologun, Doyin (28 August 2018). "Intersectionality Theory and Practice". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.48.
Bhopal, Kalwant; Preston, John, eds. (2012). Intersectionality and "Race" in Education. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-62899-3.
Burge, Amy (2018). "Intersectionality". In Robertson, Judy; et al. (eds.). EqualBITE: Gender equality in higher education. Brill. pp. 85–88. doi:10.1163/9789463511438_016. ISBN 978-94-6351-143-8.
Collins, Patricia Hill; Bilge, Sirma (2020). Intersectionality (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. ISBN 978-1-5095-3967-3.
Duran, Antonio; Jones, Susan R. (2020). "Intersectionality". In Casey, Zachary A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Critical Whiteness Studies in Education. Brill. pp. 310–320. doi:10.1163/9789004444836_041. ISBN 978-90-04-44483-6.
Falcón, Sylvanna M. (2009). "Intersectionality". In O'Brien, Jodi (ed.). Encyclopedia of Gender and Society. SAGE Publications. pp. 467–469. ISBN 978-1-4129-0916-7.
Hancock, Ange-Marie (2016). Intersectionality : an intellectual history. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1993-7038-2.\
Howard, Judith A.; Renfrow, Daniel G. (2014). "Intersectionality". In McLeod, Jane D.; Lawler, Edward J.; Schwalbe, Michael (eds.). Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer Netherlands. pp. 95–121. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_5. ISBN 978-94-017-9002-4.
"Intersectionality". ScienceDirect. Elsevier. Archived from the original on 26 November 2021.

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Juliannamurga (article contribs). Peer reviewers: J.bust0s23.

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 42corndogs (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Michellenle.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

7 October 2023

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The section title says it all. This article is a word salad conveying almost no useful information. It mostly reads like original research of someone who has smoked too many joints.

216.152.18.132 (talk) 06:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your comment just says to me "I don't understand enough of terminology to understanding the article and am pretending it is imposible to understand", but sure less jargon is good. Talpedia 07:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speciesism

Latest comment: 13 hours ago16 comments4 people in discussion

I have reverted the new speciesism content. Is there a reliable source that shows it plays a meaningful role in groups' and individuals' social and political identities? - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 03:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you go to the page of the original article. I think that you will find everything that you need there. Foristslow (talk) 05:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source. And we already have an "Intersectionality in Animal, Human and Familial Violence" section in the Intersectionality article. A separate section on speciesism seems too far from the focus of this article. Maybe drop the "people who support animal exploitation also tend to have intersectional bias" thought into the Psychology section? - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I just saw another editor's edit summary referring to WP:COATRACK. That's my concern. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion of speciesism seems off-topic for this article, despite the fact that some sources [1][2] used for speciesism and critical animal studies use an intersectional framework. That by itself only means that intersectionality is a relevant topic in discussions of speciesism, not vice versa. I'm not seeing much in the disputed material relevant to intersecting and overlapping social identities. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The term intersectionality is broad, but I do agree with what has been said about the major heading of speciesism, I can include a sub heading under the section that I created Intersectionality in Animal, Human and Familial Violence" (Personal attack removed) Foristslow (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is very FRINGE and not part of any mainstream discourse around intersectionality afaik. It does not warrant inclusion EvergreenFir (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

understand, here is a link to a paper.

https://www.academia.edu/37256448/Intersectionality_and_Speciesism

https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/student-journals/index.php/NESAIS/article/view/1469/1582 Foristslow (talk) 08:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have not needed to go to the dark web for these two papers, first page of google when you search speciesim and intersectionality, there seems to be quite a lot to warrant this subsection. Foristslow (talk) 08:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The first paper appears to be a student essay, which is not a reliable source. The author is listed as a graduate student. The second paper is from a journal for "emerging scholars in Australian indigenous studies", which is a fairly niche topic. Once again, the source is using an intersectional framework to discuss issues of speciesism and animal rights. That doesn't make it particularly relevant to an article about intersectionality itself.

Typing a combination of keywords into a search engine will return sources that use both; that doesn't mean that those sources are authoritative or that the keywords are particularly related to one another. The best practice is to find the most reliable sources on the topic of the article and then summarize what they say; otherwise you may end up working backwards from the assumption that a given term or topic is relevant, which may or may not be true. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC) edited 16:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

A couple papers does not make this any less FRINGE. Is it covered in any secondary or tertiary sources? EvergreenFir (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, you've added -

To the researchers, this is analogous to racism — the fallacious belief that races exist as branches on the tree of life, and that some species, races even lineages are superior to others .Some have said this has led to prioritizing humans and human culture over everything else and accepting that ecosystems and life within them should be destroyed to make way for humans.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

First question, what is "this"? - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 03:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Nocella, Anthony J.; George, Amber E.; Schatz, J. L., eds. (2017). The intersectionality of critical animal, disability, and environmental studies: toward eco-ability, justice, and liberation. Critical animal studies and theory. Lanham: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-4985-3443-7.
^ Birch, Jonathan (2023-06-19). "Is 'speciesism' as bad as racism or sexism?". Nature. 618 (7966): 667–668. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-01977-z.
^ Sanders, Robert. "Speciesism, like racism, imperils humanity and the planet". Berkeley.
^ Boisseron, Bénédicte (2018). Afro-dog: blackness and the animal question. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-18664-3.

holistic approch to equality Foristslow (talk) 02:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Is this an answer to my "this" question? - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Apologies that was a typo. Thanks for your time and input. I will have a look at your suggestions and will respond soon. Thankyou again Foristslow (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The first sentence of that paragraph, minus the words "species" and "lineages", was lifted directly from UC Berkeley's website. I've removed the copyright violation, but the material (a comparison between speciesism and racism) still seems off-topic in this article. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC) ("still seems off-topic in this article" Now that the section has been re-written, that is my question as well. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC))Reply

Holistic approch to equality

Latest comment: 18 hours ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A section or the inclusion incorporating a holistic approch to equality should be added. Introducing historical references. Foristslow (talk) 02:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why? What does a holistic approach to equality have to do with the subject of the article? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Nocella, Anthony J.; George, Amber E.; Schatz, J. L., eds. (2017). The intersectionality of critical animal, disability, and environmental studies: toward eco-ability, justice, and liberation. Critical animal studies and theory. Lanham: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-4985-3443-7.

[2] Birch, Jonathan (2023-06-19). "Is 'speciesism' as bad as racism or sexism?". Nature. 618 (7966): 667–668. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-01977-z.

[3] Sanders, Robert. "Speciesism, like racism, imperils humanity and the planet". Berkeley.

[4] Boisseron, Bénédicte (2018). Afro-dog: blackness and the animal question. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-18664-3.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]