Open main menu


The assessment department of the Feminism WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Feminism-related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Feminism}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Feminism articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

FAQEdit

See also the general assessment FAQ
1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? 
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 
Just add {{WikiProject Feminism}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Feminism}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? 
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
4. Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Feminism WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
5. How do I rate an article? 
Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
7. What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
8. Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

Assessment instructionsEdit

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Feminism}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WikiProject Feminism| class=??? }}

The following values may be used:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Feminism articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scaleEdit

Grading scheme
WikiProject article quality grading scheme

LogEdit

Feminism articles by quality, assessment log

October 8, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

October 7, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

October 6, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Home Alive (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Nancy Tuana (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Soledad Duterte (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

October 5, 2018Edit

RenamedEdit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

October 4, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Maria Janion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Maria Lugones (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Suomen Naisyhdistys (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

October 3, 2018Edit

RenamedEdit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

October 2, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

September 30, 2018Edit

RenamedEdit

ReassessedEdit

September 29, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

September 28, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

September 27, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 26, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 25, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 24, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Mary Yost (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

September 23, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 22, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 21, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 20, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

  • Carol Cox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

September 19, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

September 18, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Erin Pizzey (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 17, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

September 16, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Ilhan Omar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Mabel Barnett Gates (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Virgie McFarland (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

September 15, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 14, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 13, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

September 12, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 10, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 9, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 8, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Dietland (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 7, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 6, 2018Edit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 5, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Aziza Barnes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

September 4, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Pat Rosier (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

September 3, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

September 2, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Anna Whitlock (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class (rev · t).
  • Frances Cushman-Wines (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Jane Frances Winn (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Top-Class (rev · t).
  • Louise Westergaard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Rose A. Walker (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

September 1, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Fannie Edgar Thomas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Female genital mutilation in Nigeria (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Iris Cummins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Mary Richardson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class (rev · t).
  • Peggie Crombie (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 31, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

August 30, 2018Edit

ReassessedEdit

  • Edith Ainge (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class (rev · t).
  • Katharine A. Morey (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class (rev · t).
  • Rochester Women's Rights Convention of 1848 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class (rev · t).
  • Rosamund Massy (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Sallie F. Chapin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class (rev · t).
  • Sarah Field Splint (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

AssessedEdit

  • Aretha (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Queen of Soul (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

RemovedEdit