Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Feminism
| Main page | Talk page | Members | Resources | Popular pages |
|---|
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Feminism and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | WikiProject Feminism was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 7 March 2011. |
Requested move at Talk:Prostitution in the State of Palestine#Requested move 18 April 2025
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Prostitution in the State of Palestine#Requested move 18 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr (lets chat) 04:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Input needed on sourcing/synthesis issues in Femosphere article
editHi all,
I’d appreciate any help reviewing the “radicalisation narratives” section of the Femosphere article, which was recently kept at AfD “without prejudice toward a rewrite to address NPOV and content issues.”
The section presents several ideological claims (e.g., rejection of liberal feminism, use of misandrist tropes) as signs of radicalisation. However:
- none of the 7 cited sources define or group these claims into a cohesive radicalisation framework.
- Several sources directly contradict the framing:
- The Guardian (citation 1) states: “There’s no evidence to say that the femosphere is radicalising its members in the same way as the manosphere…”
- Bullet 2 characterizes denying misandry/misogyny equivalence as a radicalization narrative, but cites The Independent (citation 9), an op-ed arguing against that equivalence, and Hedges (2024, citation 10), which critiques how misandry is weaponized against feminism; neither source supports the claim or uses fallacy/radicalization framing.
Some citations refer to the “womanosphere” rather than the “femosphere” which are different but overlapping terms (e.g., citation 6), yet the section synthesizes them into a single radicalization narrative. This raises concerns under WP:SYNTH.
Most citations are unquoted and lack attributed viewpoints, raising additional concerns under WP:V.
Would anyone be willing to take a look at the section and weigh in on what may be appropriate to bring it in line with sourcing and attribution policies?
Thanks so much,
Requested move at Talk:Frente Unico Pro Derechos de la Mujer#Requested move 11 May 2025
edit An editor has requested that Frente Unico Pro Derechos de la Mujer be moved to Sole Front for Women's Rights., which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Spookyaki (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Sexual diversity#Requested move 23 May 2025
edit There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sexual diversity#Requested move 23 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. LIrala (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Please improve this article with more citations and an image. Bearian (talk) 00:30, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Gloria Steinem
editGloria Steinem has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Finger pinching conspiracy theory has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:30, 18 June 2025 (UTC)