Talk:Hillsong Church UK

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Laterthanyouthink in topic Removed 'multiple issues' maintenance template

Citation

edit

Hillsong has the biggest single congregation in England; I am deleting that until it can be backed up by a reputable source.TheFunhead (talk) 21:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Colour Your World

edit

I remember going to Colour Your World conference in 2001 or 2002 in London....it started much earlier than 2004 - can somewhere check it out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.248.78.152 (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hillsong Church London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removed 'multiple issues' maintenance template

edit

I've removed the maintanence template:

As the majority of references are secondary sources, the majority of statements now have references and it was added 7 years ago. PandaWent (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the cleanup, PandaWent. I have often found that stale templates sit there for years after an article has been much improved! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"death of George Floyd" vs. "murder of George Floyd"

edit

Hello, I am continuing a thread I started on User talk:Laterthanyouthink#"death of George Floyd" vs. "murder of George Floyd": I believe the term "murder" is the appropriate terminology, rather than "death of George Floyd". The pastor's comment about Floyd's murder occurred two days after Chauvin had already been arrested and charged with murder, so it wasn't a "Floyd's murder was a couple hours ago so lets wait and see" type of deal. Another user (Walter Görlitz has already reverted back to "murder" so I feel – at least for now – a local consensus has been established for "murder". Upon request of Laterthanyouthink I am posting here for better visibility and further discussion about changing this consensus to "death". Fwiw, the consensus at murder of George Floyd is very firmly established as "murder".-Ich (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for posting, Ich. Just to be clear, your last sentence doesn't apply to my change, as I have absolutely no issue with the article name, nor the crime being called a murder. It was only in the context of when this pastor made his comment, as it seems to imply that the crime had already been deemed a murder by means of a conviction being obtained when he made it. Technically, at the time, the only established fact was that Floyd had died, albeit under circumstances that clearly pointed to an unnatural death. And if you remember, there were those who argued that he had a pre-existing condition, was under the influence of drugs, etc. I don't feel strongly enough about it one way or another to argue the point further - but this is just by way of explaining why I deliberately chose to use the redirect rather than the article name for the purposes of referring to it in this article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply