Talk:Hajduk

Untitled

I removed these hajduks added by User:151.205.9.162, since they fail the google test.

• Milan Mileusnic (living legend)
• Damir Arnautovic (living legend)
• Vlado Brnecic (living legend)
• Rajko Pupavac (living legend)
• Vlado Magas (living legend)
• Germano Nefat (living legend)
• Damir Susanj (living legend)
• Edo Demark (living legend)
• Petar Popic (living legend)
• Damir Matesevac (living legend)

bogdan | ^Talk 16:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Avram Iancu

How does he qualify as a haiduk? he was one of the leaders of an organised, national resistance movement with clear aims. He was a lawyer for God's sake! You might as easily say that George Washington was a haiduk since he too was a well educated commander of irregular troops, fighting against what he perceived were national opressors. Avram Iancu clearly does not qualify as a haiduk, i have heard this term describing only local guerrilas/bandits with a limited goal. Not a revolutionary leader! And also... I believe this article should not be linked to the WikiProjectSerbia since haiducs are part of the national myth of several other European countries. Serbia doesn't have a copyright on them. 89.35.62.12 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801031709/http://www.rastko.org.rs/istorija/xix/apetrovic-banditry_eng.html to http://www.rastko.org.rs/istorija/xix/apetrovic-banditry_eng.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160322072135/http://www.rastko.org.rs/knjizevnost/usmena/bsuvajdzic-uskoci.html to http://www.rastko.org.rs/knjizevnost/usmena/bsuvajdzic-uskoci.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621010338/http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Stephenson:Neal:Quicksilver:391:Haiduks_(Professorbikeybike) to http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Stephenson:Neal:Quicksilver:391:Haiduks_(Professorbikeybike)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Error in spelling

Hello,

Rewrite Hajduk to Haiduk.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/haiduk

Thank you Marino 08:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, my name is Losangelessloth and I also am here to propose and promote changing the erroneous spelling of the title of this Wikipedia Entry.

Specifically, from Hajduk to Haiduk.

I have here five (5) sources which all contain a singular, uniform spelling of this word. All five (5) sources choose to spell the title of this Wikipedia entry as: haiduk.

[1] There is the spelling from Dictionary.com already sourced by Marino around a year ago. .

[2] Secondly, there is the spelling from Merriam-Webster.com (apparently a company/publisher since 1823) .

[3] Thirdly, Britannica.com agrees with the previous two sources' spelling .

[4] Fourthly, I have a less renowned source which most likely obtains their content from more well established publishers, but, nevertheless, still displays the consistency/uniformity apparent across all other sources. The reference is from: Collins.com .

[5] Lastly, a similar source (in terms of lack of prestige) to [4] is thefreedictionary.com -- which follows the same characteristic pattern of spelling the word in question as: Haiduk .

Would anyone wish to discuss what more is necessary to push a change in the title of the Wikipedia entry?

I feel as though this collection of references should be quite sufficient, no?

If not, what more is required so that such a change can be made un-contested?

 Is it possible to change the title myself? I < 3 you. 

Losangelessloth (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

References

Contradiction

The opening sentence claims that hajdúk is the plural for hajdú. The first sentence of the fourth paragraph of the lede claims hajdúk is singular for hajduci. These two statements contradict one another. Please provide sources for these claims and edit as needed to resolve the contradiction. 2603:9001:4500:1C09:B195:F1C5:7920:6AD3 (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

I dont know what is the "hajduci" (as this is not Hungarian) but I know sure as native speaker this: simple Hungarian: "hajdú" (simple) and "hajdúk" (plural) OrionNimrod (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)