Talk:Haganai

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

About Yukimura's gender edit

I don't know if Yukimura is a girl or a boy, but many sites threats Yukimura as a girl, so perhaps a double-reverse trap ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MisaoFan (talkcontribs) 13:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, it´s said that Yukimura lacks a penis - therefore beeing no guy after all - in an inofficial translation of the light novel, volume 5, chapter 6 ~ "Hot Spring". You can find it here. 188.102.245.162 (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Last line in Sena Kashiwazaki's description is confusing edit

I'm utterly confused by the last line under Sena Kashiwazaki's description. "In Volume 8, Sena proposes to Kodaka, asking him to marry her. Sena also confesses to Kodaka that she loves her." This is obviously a typo. Sena proposes marriage to Kodaka, but is it Sena who confesses or Kodaka? I have no access to the light novels so I can't confirm it. Can anyone correct this? Elreicht (talk) 08:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Shorten to Haganai edit

We can probably just shorten the article's title to Haganai since, as far as the anime is concerned at least, Funimation don't appear to be using the subtitle "We Have Few Friends" in their releases. Wonchop (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well the manga still has the I Don't Have Many Friends subtitle. I'm not sure whether the light novels are being officially published in English. But it is likely the anime will be more popular in the long run. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
The novels aren't licensed in English. The "I don't have many friends" subtitle is present in Funi's dub trailer as well as the cover, but on the other hand the title listed everywhere is just "Haganai". I agree with the move to "Haganai", as that is most commonly used to refer to the franchise as a whole, as well as each part of it individually, including the manga. I have added a move request below. ー HigherFive | 〉 20:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Haganai: I Don't Have Many FriendsHaganai – The title "Haganai" is most commonly used to refer to the franchise as a whole, as well as each part of it individually. ー HigherFive | 〉 20:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. Seems appropriate enough, especially since "Haganai" is the main title Funimation is going with. It comes down to a matter of what it is actually officially licensed as, which is something I'll support as well. ーKirtZJTalk 21:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add plot summaries for light novels and manga edit

The light novels need to be expanded to the List of Volumes so that they include summaries. Otherwise, the character detail will continue to bloat based on events from the series. It would also help to highlight some of the happenings in the Plot section. -AngusWOOF (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC) updated 00:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've added the list of light novels and their ISBN's. Note that the publish date for the light novels and manga are month only as the day is shown to vary between Amazon, the other store vendors, and MediaFactory's website. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment importance? edit

Can the reception / legacy section be expanded upon to show the popularity and significance of the series in the Oricon light novel rankings? I see some stuff regarding Connect, but it needs the sources from 2011 and earlier years to show how it's dominated that market. The light novels haven't been published internationally, so it would have to show significance within Japan. The manga should be checked against New York Times bestseller lists. The anime series, while it has a second season, doesn't show how it did in ratings or critical acclaim. Once that's done, a better argument can be made to raise its level to Mid-importance. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

This may not be relevant... edit

I have no idea if this is relevant (but I found it so), but three characters from Oreimo make a three-and-a-half second cameo appearance in one of the anime episodes in season one where Rika is talking about conventions. You only see them from behind, not their faces, but there is absolutely no doubt it's them. It should be mentioned in the notes or trivia section or something... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.18.147.239 (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

In-jokes are usually not notable for the article. If you need to show that the same crew worked on OreImo, then add a note to its production section like "The animation director is X, who worked on the previous anime series OreImo". There's a similar scene in Kannagi where the director put in a cameo of the girls from Lucky Star, with a common thread being that the series director for Kannagi was the original director on Lucky Star's first four episodes. It should also be backed by a reliable source and not just a cite episode where it is open to interpretation. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Haganai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply