Talk:Gerold of Lausanne

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Gerold of Lausanne prohibited Catholic church services from being held in Jerusalem in 1229? Source: Bernard Hamilton, The Latin Church in the Crusader States (Cambridge University Press, 1980), pg. 259.
  • ALT1:... that Gerold of Lausanne was abbot of Molesme, abbot of Cluny, and bishop of Valence before becoming Latin patriarch of Jerusalem in 1225? Source: Wilhelm Jacobs, Patriarch Gerold von Jerusalem: Ein Beitrag zur Kreuzzugsgeschichte Friedrichs II. (Aachen, 1905), pg. 7-11.

Created by Adam Bishop (talk). Self-nominated at 00:10, 10 July 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - see below
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - AGF

Hook eligibility:

• Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
• Interesting: - see below

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Original hook (ALT0) should be good to go, because it is more interesting than the alternative hook (ALT1). Although the year from the original hook is not present in the article, the nominator should also provide an information to the article that has a year that corresponds to the hook. The nominator should also provide a footnote on the 1st paragraph at the section of "Patriarch of Jerusalem". JeBonSer ^{(talk | sign)} 18:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I added the specific date of the interdict. For the first paragraph, I was just giving some basic background history, which shouldn't really need to be cited, should it? Not really sure what I could footnote there... Adam Bishop (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

• You're right. Everything is fine now. AGF for offline hook references. Original hook (ALT0) is good to go now. JeBonSer ^{(talk | sign)} 07:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)