Talk:French destroyer Kersaint (1931)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Kersaint (1931)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 22:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


On my list. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Is the range or the shell weight of the main armament known?
    • Sure, but I save those sorts of details for the class article which gets all the technical details.
  • "although these were older models than the one previously installed" Either "older models" → 'an older model'; or "one" → 'ones'.
  • "lest the ships be turned over" "lest"? You've been reading my articles. Optional, suggest 'to prevent the ships being ... '
    • Is that a terribly old-fashioned term? I like it because it's economical, and, you know, every additional keystroke is something to be avoided if I'm to maintain my current level of output. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well up to your usual standards. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed