Talk:Free Churro

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Free Churro/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• In the caption, change "delivering" to "delivers".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Remove the comma after "episodes of 2018".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Plot

• Remove the comma after "was not true".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Remove the comma after "wrong funeral".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Production

• "title character (Bea Arthur) speaking" → "title character, Bea Arthur, speaking"  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• The reference after "therapist" doesn't mention the episode's title, so I would add a second reference that does (like this).  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Citations should always be used after every quote, so I would recite the one from Collider after "single monologue".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• The source being used from Animation World Network actually says the three angles were switched "between talking about his mother, riffing on things, and telling funny stories", not "his mother, riffing and making jokes, and telling anecdotes".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• "for half an hour" → "for [half an hour]" or "for a half hour" (the actual quote)  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• The rest of the article uses the entire show's title BoJack Horseman, so I would change the only use of BoJack after "other episodes of" to just that.  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Reception

• Add a "Critical response" or "Critical reception" subsection header.  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Try adding more reviews and lowering the use of quotes with the guidelines at WP:RECEPTION.  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

References

• Washington Post → The Washington Post  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Mark references from The Washington Post with "|url-access=limited".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Mark references from The New Republic with "|url-access=limited"  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Mark references from Time with "|url-access=limited".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Mark references from The Atlantic with "|url-access=limited".  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Try archiving all sources. I recommend using this tool.  Done Kncny11 ^(shoot) 23:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

DYK nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 04:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Will Arnett is the only voice actor to appear in the BoJack Horseman episode "Free Churro"? Source: The half-hour was split between a pair of monologues from Arnett
  • ALT1:... that "Free Churro" was the first episode of BoJack Horseman to be nominated for Outstanding Animated Program at the Primetime Emmy Awards? Source: "We've actually never been nominated as a show for an Emmy. Kristen Schaal was nominated for her voice work, and that's our sole Emmy nomination prior to this."

• Reviewed: Jake Funk
• Comment: Getting in just under the wire. I know what I'm doing.

Improved to Good Article status by Kncny11 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC).

• The article was promoted to GA on 2 March, long enough, neutral, referenced and no copyvio obvious. The hooks are interesting and referenced. Images used the article are either free or fair use. QPQ done. Corachow (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)