Talk:Fred Narganes

Latest comment: 10 days ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk13:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Narganes, c. 1900s or early 1910s

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Fred Narganes; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   This article was newly expanded when nominated, is long enough (>4,300 chars), and shows no signs of plagiarism from online sources. It maintains a suitably neutral tone, establishing the subject's notability without getting too laudatory. The QPQ review looks good. The claims in the article are all supported by cited sources. The hook has some interesting firsts and is present in the article, supported by a cited source. Admins could consider adding the infobox image from the article, if they wanted a hook with an interesting image. The article looks ready for DYK to me. Good work! Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Fred Narganes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 14:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Add Cuba to first sentence.
    • Added.
  • "A native of Havana, Cuba" remove Cuba here after you add Cuban to first sentence.
    • Removed.
  • Added cats: Cuban male sport wrestlers, Columbia Lions wrestlers.
  • Remove refs from lead.
    • Removed.
  • Do you known when he moved to the US?
    • Didn't see anything mentioning it.
  • Link London in lead I suppose.
    • Linked.
  • "he regained the title of NYAC middleweight champion" I didn't know he won it, the previous sentences didn't say anything about middleweight?
    • I didn't see middleweight in the source, or remember why I put that, so I removed 'middleweight'.
  • "The National Wrestling Hall of Fame and Museum summarized his career" He didn't get inducted, did he?
    • He did not, as far as I can tell – the Hall of Fame wrote an article about Latino wrestlers and talked about him, but it doesn't look like he was inducted.
  • Just curious how you know that picture is circa "1900s–1910s".
    • It looks like a picture from his career and his career was in those years. Could remove it if you like.
  • Remove "Nationality: Latino" from infobox. Not a nationality.
    • Removed.

I think that's everything. Nice research on this guy. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.