Talk:Frank Cho

unsupportive of independent comic book creators and self-publishers?

This assertion is poorly worded, and does not appear to have any support. It should be deleted.

College doesn't make sense?

It says he did the cartoon for the University of Maryland, College Park's Diamondback, but it never says he attended school there... (the Nursing School is in Baltimore). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omarcheeseboro (talk • contribs) 15:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Frank went to the nursing school in Baltimore, but his comic appeared in the Diamondback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.164.245.217 (talk) 22:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Influences?

This could use some note(s) on influences of his style. Is he a fan of classic masters like Frank Frazetta or the more modern artists like Mark Schultz?Rickremember (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Done - needs expanding and a tonne more sources. I'd normally put this as a Start-class but will leave it at C but it is a low C and needs a lot more work. (Emperor (talk) 01:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC))

Great Cho Feature from Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/20/AR2010082003733.html

"Well Endowed Women" Euphemism?

Not an expert, but surely wikipedia should just say what it means rather than deal with this euphemistically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.172.225.200 (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

"Well-endowed women" is not a euphemism. It's simply the proper, formal way of wording as per WP:TONE, so it does indeed say what it means. What wording would you prefer? Nightscream (talk) 01:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly. Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.examiner.com/a-913735~Two_centuries_at_the_heart_of_Baltimore.html

  Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Ive removed the link and the infobox that this bot produces from the article. The link was to examiner.com which is a confirmed non-reliable source and it 404'd anyway. Googling for the article name that the link was supposed to point to only produced this wikipedia article and sites scraping it. The reference also humorously enough listed examiner.com as The Washington Examiner which is washingtonexaminer.com and is a newspaper and not a PPC self publishing forum. Ill do some homework and follow up here in case further action is needed - the misnaming could have been deliberate, Im not sure. Jaydubya93 (talk) 13:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Here is when the link was placed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Cho&diff=prev&oldid=199987388 It was added by Quackslikeaduck. Originally, the source was labelled as Examiner (Washington D.C.). Currently its based out of Denver but that might have been different 5 years ago. It also was not formatted as "Washington Examiner". Based on this and the other edits by the user seems to have been a simple mistake, compounded by editors who tried to be helpful after the fact by renaming the source of the citation without bothering to click-through the link and reading the name of the cite or any other sort of verification of their modification of the citation, let alone verification of the citation itself. TL;DR no intentional spamming or bad faith of any kind. Jaydubya93 (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

My apologies, Jaydubya93. I will be more diligent in the future, and in particular will not use citations from Examiner.com. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

No worries! I have just been going through pages flagged by the blacklist-bot so please know I did not intend to single you out in any way. My real concern was the mislabeling of the citation, which was unusual but definitely wasn't intentional. Please keep up all the good work and thank you for your continued edits. Jaydubya93 (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Frank Cho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120513120703/http://archives.tcj.com/3_online/f_l_ignatzes.html to http://archives.tcj.com/3_online/f_l_ignatzes.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110810103743/http://www.spxpo.com/1999-ignatz-award-recipients to http://www.spxpo.com/1999-ignatz-award-recipients
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100829082238/http://www.harveyawards.org:80/awards_2006nom.html to http://www.harveyawards.org/awards_2006nom.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Cho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161114165707/http://comicsalliance.com/responses-to-frank-cho-spider-gwen-cover/ to http://comicsalliance.com/responses-to-frank-cho-spider-gwen-cover/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Cho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324011734/http://archives.tcj.com/3_online/n_102299.html to http://archives.tcj.com/3_online/n_102299.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frank Cho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080503122450/http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=12813 to http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=12813
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614085031/http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=1636 to http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=1636

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)