Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 5 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wanyue1210.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 3 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DaughterofAse.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

[Untitled] edit

Article Length/Depth The article gives great citations and many sources as well as in-depth information but the article contains many sections that could be narrowed to one section.Shaquillapatterson (talk) 00:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Article organization/sections edit

This article needs a lot of work. The lede is weak, potentially confusing, and does not give sufficient indication of the direction of the article. What other sections would we need to make it complete?

  • History
  • Media and Content (The Muse, Beauty, The Goddess, Performance, Craft, Book Arts, Quilts, Cunt Art, Motherhood, etc)Feministkilljoy (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Leading figures
  • Key works
  • Relationship to the women's movement
  • Legacy
  • Other?

Under history, I am not a fan of the division by decade. I don't think that there needs to be such a strict division between 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Perhaps there can be a distinction between Second Wave, Third Wave, and Fourth Wave feminist artists, but even then I think it's much more clear to outline issues. Feministkilljoy (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography edit

1. Battersby, Christine. Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1989. Print.

2. Betterton, Rosemary. "Body Horor." An Intimate Distance: Women, Artists, and the Body. London: Routledge, 1996. 130-61. Print.

3. Butler, Cornelia H., and Lisa Gabrielle. Mark. WACK!: Art and the Feminist Revolution. Los Angeles: Museum of Contemporary Art, 2007. Print.

4. Confessions of the Guerrilla Girls / by the Guerrilla Girls (whoever They Really Are) ; with an Essay by Whitney Chadwick. New York: HarperPerennial, 1995. Print.

5. Deepwell, Katy. New Feminist Art Criticism: Critical Strategies. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1995. Print.

6. Garber, Elizabeth (1990) "Feminist Art Criticism: Issues in Feminist Criticism Written About the Work of May Stevens," Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education: Vol. 8: Iss. 1, Article 5.

7. Hein, Hilde S., and Carolyn Korsmeyer. Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1993. Print.

8. Newman, Michael, and Jon Bird. "Cleaning Up the 1970s; The Work of Judy Chicago , Mary Kelly, and Mierle Laderman Ukeles." Rewriting Conceptual Art. London, UK: Reaktion, 1999. 107-17. Print.

9. Nochlin, Linda. “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” In Art and Sexual Politics: Women’s Liberation, Women Artists, and Art History. Edited by Thomas B. Hess and Elizabeth C. Baker 44. New York: Collier, 1973.

10. Pollock, Griselda. Generations and Geographies in the Visual Arts: Feminist Readings. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.

Jjp73 (talk) 04:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thoughts on elaboration of the subject edit

The start of recent additions has been a nice added touch so far. Giving an in-depth depiction of what feminism is trying to achieve is a great.

Is it possible to discuss possibly in more detail about the different types of medium such as fiber art or such? If these ideas were fleshed out more in the article I imagine it would enrich the article as a whole greatly. Any sort of references to these works would also be beneficial as well. Keep up the good work. Joeycut (talk) 01:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Feminist art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Just look at this picture"? edit

which picture though? who wrote this? 79.76.117.94 (talk) 13:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Images edit

As this is a visual topic, the inclusion of more images to showcase what the article may be talking about would improve this article. Images of feminist art or artists who were/are feminist artists would some great images to include. Hmcleod21 (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160B edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 September 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Linlin Jiang (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Xinyue Hu (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies-16 edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 February 2023 and 19 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Benzubu (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by James073 (talk) 04:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feminist art pre 1960s and from countries other than the US edit

This article pays scant attention to feminist art before the 1960s. I'm not expert in the subject, but this seems like a very bold claim. What about the British Famous Women Dinner Service of 1932-1934, for example? The 'history' section needs serious expansion, written with a non-US-favouring approach.

Also, I strongly object to the extremely American-centric opinion "After women gained suffrage in the United States in the early 1920s, a wave of liberalization spread throughout the world, leading to gradual changes in feminist art." Global liberalisation from the 1920s onwards is due to the American women's suffrage movement? I think not. Stronach (talk) 12:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, as far as the easily accessible information goes Famous Women Dinner Service was co-created by a man, and commissioned by a man - and, seemingly, hardly got recognition because it wasn't displayed. A quote in its article goes as far as to say that "it is impossible to ascertain" whether other artists even knew the set existed.
On the exceptionally American, or American exceptionalism, view points I agree with you - though it has to be said that America certainly does radiate, culturally. So maybe an edit for tone is in order, but anything more would need to be sourced, I would think. JackTheSecond (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply