A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Updates Needed and Article Needs Cleaning Up edit

I am evaluating this article for a school assignment. This is a well-written article apart from appearance and mechanics. The tone of the article is very subjective and impartial to which I applaud the original author.However, the appearance is quite messy and the mechanics leave something to be desired. The article also has not been updated in a few weeks and needs to be updated with current audience numbers and new sources as more information about Eva comes about. The appearance of the article (spacing, etc.) needs to also be improved along with the grammar and mechanics. snappedrain23 :) 01:26, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Snappedrain23, "subjective" or "objective"? Most importantly, I wish you had taken something more substantial to review--this short article can only generate a short review, or that you had picked an article where there's more sources than just news and gossip articles. Dr Aaij (talk) 21:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply