Talk:Dan Henning

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dan Henning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dan Henning/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

With all due respect, this entry for Dan Henning is more of a rant than a well-rounded informational passage. While the information may be entirely accurate and the sentiment well-founded, the entry reads as an opinion piece with an agenda to promote and therefore diminishes Wikipedia's credibility as an objective resource. Readers interested in learning more about the full career of Dan Henning (highs and lows) will not be served by this article. Bluesdog23 15:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 12:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)