Talk:Colonia (music group)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Colonia (music group). Please take a moment to review edit #1 edit #2 edit #3. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Colonia (music group)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==November 2012==

The article relies rather extensively on primary sources, i.e. on the band's official site. As long as this is the source of non-controversial information on the band's activity, the use of primary sources is not a problem. However, it would be a good idea to replace these with reliable secondary sources wherever possible. (Now is a good opportunity, since the above mentioned links seem to be dead.)

The coverage should be extended to the band's most recent album, published in 2010.

Other than that, no problems with the article, and I still think it satisfies the B1 criterion of WP:BCLASS, as well as the rest of the criteria. GregorB (talk) 14:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 14:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 12:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)