This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
Latest comment: 14 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
Article was nominated within three days of creation, so is new enough. It's more than long enough. The article properly uses in-line citations and the copyvio detector finds nothing outside of dates and names of institutions. Both hooks are good, interesting, and cited in-line. I think the original hook is worded best, personally. The QPQ has been done. Looks good to go! SilverserenC 23:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Article was nominated within three days of creation, so is new enough. It's more than long enough. The article properly uses in-line citations and the copyvio detector finds nothing outside of dates and names of institutions. Both hooks are good, interesting, and cited in-line. I think the original hook is worded best, personally. The QPQ has been done. Looks good to go! SilverserenC 23:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)