Talk:Celeste Buckingham

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Way too over-referenced / Poor grammar edit

Whoever wrote this or does an update: PLEASE trim back the densite of ref-tags. They are obstructive to and ugly for readers. We just don't need to be told for every little clause, and so many are repeats. I don't see contention statements, so ...? Tony (talk) 09:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. And the writing is rather poor and needs wikifying. Edwardx (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Edward. I guess one guiding principle might be that ref-tags are generally retrospective in their effect, so putting on or two after several sentences they support can be done in many places. Some double refs could be made single, probably, unless it's contentious. Reps for successive sentences can easily be removed. Tony (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
All makes sense to me. Alas, there are plenty of more serious content issues on WP that need work, so I can't give it my attention, especially as anything one does is only likely to get messed around with by her "fans". Edwardx (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A substantial chunk of this (at least) is non-native English, likely achieved by running an already-existing Slovak article through Google translate.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Celeste Buckingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply