Talk:Camp Lockett

Initial comment

Camp Lockett Wiki page begun using Buffalo Soldiers page as boilerplate. 23:48, 10 July 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob92110 (talk • contribs)

Suspected copyright violation

This edit added 274K of text, making the article the third largest listed at Special:LongPages. The subject clearly isn't important enough to justify an article of that length. (Per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collector of information.)

More importantly, the most likely way that this much text could be added is simply by copying and pasting from another source. Unless that source is in the public domain, such copying is a copyright violation. Accordingly, I have reverted the edit. A limited amount of that information is welcome to be added back to the article provided (a) that the source is identified, and (b) that the amount of material taken from that source is in compliance with fair use laws.

Finally, I note that the article has only one external link, which is to http://www.militarymuseum.org. The material there is copyrighted (by default, because there appears to be nothing saying elsewise), meaning that only very limited amounts can be used directly from that website. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I have done a lot in a few days to improve this article, as have many before me. I kindly ask you leave the content alone for now. I have just added a significant amount of history for the 19th Century Section, and will be adding more after some much needed rest.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Links for use for expansion of content in World War I section

Please do not delete these links, they will be used for later as cite-able references for this section.

• History of Campo
• History of the 11th Cavalry
• Camp Hearn and the 11th Cavalry
• Camp Hearn and the 11th Cavalry
• Camp Morena and the 11th Cavalry
• Camp Seeley and the 11th Cavalry

For use with World War II Section

• Campo's connect to 26th Cavalry
• Campo's connect to 26th Cavalry
• Buffalo Soldier's connection to Camp Lockett

• Camp Locket on the Pacific Ridge Trail

--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Re-assessment for b-class

The article has sufficient supporting material (infobox and pictures) though a picture of the camp itself would be nice. However, several sections are not sufficiently referenced, especially the part on the current status.PINTofCARLING (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

This section is of concern, and is the majority of the article prior to my work began on improving it. It appears to be heavily based upon the application that was used to attempt to designate the area as a National Historical District; unfortunately, I do not have access to said application, nor have I found it online. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Camp Lockett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220013418/http://www.buffalosoldiers-lawtonftsill.org/28-cav.htm to http://www.buffalosoldiers-lawtonftsill.org/28-cav.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090430010940/http://www.calgold.com/calgold/Default.asp?Series=300 to http://www.calgold.com/calgold/Default.asp?Series=300

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)