Talk:Bud Anderson

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

merging articles edit

This article should be merged. Clarence E. Anderson and Bud Anderson are the same person.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cas4j (talkcontribs) 12:16, 7 May 2006.

  • Appears to have been done and redirect made. —ERcheck @ 01:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

Bud AndersonClarence E. Anderson — move to full name —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
  • SupportJoseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. "Bud Anderson" seems to be widely used, and articles about people rarely go at their full name. WP:NC: "the name of an article should be "the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things"." For example, Jimmy Carter is not at "James Earl Carter, Jr." FiggyBee 08:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per Figgy. See Bill Clinton (not William Jefferson), Magic Johnson, or Boomer Esiason. Patstuarttalk|edits 07:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. I agree with FiggyBee and Patstuart Mumby 08:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bud Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply