Talk:Branko Mikulić

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified



Untitled edit

I don't know what did lead the author to his claim that Mikulić's and Pozderac's efforts were steps towards Bosnian independence. Mikulić was a staunch pro-Yugoslav politician and therefore was in disfavour of Slovenian and Croatian separatists as well as Serbian hegemonists. Mikulić and Pozderac would never accept the Bosniak hegemonism which is a leading ideology of so-called pro-Bosnian, in fact pro-Bosniak parties in present-day Bosnia. BlueRoar (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: Partisans edit

Unsourced claim of his joining the Partisans. Did he really do so in 1943, aged 14 or 15? Quis separabit? 15:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Branko Mikulić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply