Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Socialism

WikiProject iconSocialism Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Welcome to the WikiProject Socialism talk page. If you have comments or believe something can be improved, feel free to post. Also feel free to introduce yourself if you plan on becoming an active editor!

List of archives

1, 2, 3

Colectivo (Venezuela) edit

  A current discussion is taking place regarding the neutrality of the article Colectivo (Venezuela). Feel free to take a look and participate!--WMrapids (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article reassessment for McCarthyism edit

McCarthyism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Marcia Falkender, Baroness Falkender#Requested move 3 January 2024 edit

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Marcia Falkender, Baroness Falkender#Requested move 3 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for input on merge proposal edit

I have made a proposal that Marxism-Leninism-Maoism be merged into Maoism.

Currently, I've only received feedback from three other people, one pro merge, two against. Only one of those against the merge has given significant feedback and currently I think the discussion is at an impasse. This is so as neither of us have budged from our original positions and the person has stated that they no longer wish to restate their arguments. So, in the interest of not tagging them when they feel that they have said all that they can say, I hope someone here can help tip the scales either way.

The discussion page is here: Talk:Maoism#Merge proposal

My argument could be summarised as the following:

  • Modern groups and individuals who refer to themselves as 'Maoists' tend to use the terms 'Mao Zedong Thought', 'Maoism' and 'Marxism-Leninism-Maoism' interchangeably. This is not limited to the west.
  • The only sources that have been provided that describe a difference between 'Maoism' and 'Marxism-Leninism-Maoism' are quite old.
  • What differences there are with modern Maoism and 'the thought of Mao Zedong' are minimal at best (imo) and (imo) these differences are vague and often border on sophistry.
  • Currently, nearly everything covered by Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is covered in Maoism, and Maoism covers a greater range of content. I'd argue this is due to the two terms being largely interchangeable, not due to editors getting things wrong.


The argument against merging (obviously I'm biased here so please read the discussion yourself):

  • Maoism and Marxism-Leninism-Maoism are different, the former meaning 'the thought of Mao Zedong' and the latter being an ideology developed after the death of Mao.
  • Currently, the article on 'Maoism' is actually about 'Mao Zedong Thought' and the article on 'Marxism-Leninism-Maoism' is low quality but could be developed to include information which would differentiate it from 'Maoism'.

FropFrop (talk) 07:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dahua Technology's minority state ownership edit

  FYI
 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see Talk:Dahua Technology#Incorrect terminology in infobox and lead - Additional input requested from editors on how to refer to a Chinese company with 11.67% state ownership. This has been a two-party dispute, in which I offered a third opinion, but both parties think additional voices would help settle the question.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  09:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FAR for Emmy Noether edit

I have nominated Emmy Noether for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Kim Ju-ae#Requested move 26 February 2024 edit

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kim Ju-ae#Requested move 26 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]