Talk:Arkeia Software

problems

I consider this article too promotional.

1. The company name is used too often
2. there are too many short paragraphs
3. there are excessive product details , e.g. ". The enterprise license includes one backup server running on Ubuntu, up to 250GB capacity for backup to disk, " -- the size of the disk is a specification subject to frequent change, and not encyclopedic information.
4. advertising phrases are used,m e.g. " comes bundled with everything needed to implement a backup solution" -- this is not encyclopedic language
5. Too much use is made of quotations from reviews.

DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

I will revise this article per your comments ASAP. Sorry for the delay!Michael Leeman (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I revised the article and hopefully have addressed the above comments in a satisfactory fashion.Michael Leeman (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Although the fact that its earlier products were reviewed in RSs shows permanent notability, the coverage here is still a little disproportionate, and make it more likely to be attacked by those who do not realize this principle. This is particularly true since some of the praised features may be either fairly common, or obsolete. I suggest clarifying it by reorganizing into chronological order. It's an interesting question of style to what extent to quote from reviews in the text of an article. This is a skilled job of working it into the text, but some people prefer to do it in the footnote. This might reduce the effect of the emphasis on older features. Remember that the element of notability is the fact that there was a substantial review, not that the review praised it. It would be equally notable if they had panned it. This is the difference between promotionalism and NPOV. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I made some revisions to the text. Also, to address the advert template, I removed (I believe) any unnecessary mentions of the company name, excessive product details, etc. Please let me know what you think. Thank you as always!Michael Leeman (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arkeia Software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110320000357/http://www.thewhir.com:80/web-hosting-news/111209_Arkeia_Releases_Free_Network_Backup_Software_for_Ubuntu to http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/111209_Arkeia_Releases_Free_Network_Backup_Software_for_Ubuntu

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)