Talk:Angela Rose

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Unexplained removal of sourced content

edit

I have reverted a number of changes to this article that:

  • Removed sourced content and the sources that went with that content.
  • Introduced a number of unknown parameters into citations.
  • Replaced article text with copyright violations, large portions of text essentially copied from sources.
  • Removed the subject's birth name and a source that supported it.

Please discuss proposed changes here before reintroducing any of these changes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bartucci?

edit

Please provide a reliable source for this. Thank you. Harry Let us have speaks 18:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Angela Rose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply