Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment

Cyclone barnstar.png

WikiProject
Tropical Cyclones

WikiProject home (talk)
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32
| 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40

Task forces

Seasons task force (talk)
Storms task force (talk)
Meteorology task force (talk)
Western Pacific task force (talk)
Eastern Pacific task force (talk)
Atlantic task force (talk)
North Indian Ocean task force (talk)
Southern Hemisphere task force (talk)
Anomalous cyclones task force (talk)
Graphics task force (talk)
2018 FT task force (talk)
Newsletter (talk)
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32
| 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41
Project resources (talk)
Jargon (talk)
WikiProject statistics (talk)
Article requests (talk)
Merging discussions (talk)
Vital articles (talk)
Style guidelines (talk)
Article tables by quality (talk)

Assessment

Main assessment page (talk)
Assessment tables (talk)
Assessment log (talk)
Assessment statistics (talk)

Tropical cyclones portal

Article assessment is the process by which tropical cyclone articles are sorted by quality into the different quality categories. This page provides information on the assessment scale as well as the current practice of assessing articles.

Assessment scaleEdit

The scale for assessments is defined at Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment. Articles are divided into the following categories.

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

These criteria apply to general-content articles. Tropical cyclone articles have additional criteria/guidelines about what sorts of content and formatting should be provided for an article of each class; see the talk page for discussion of these.

Each tropical cyclone article has its assessment included inside the {{hurricane}} template, such as {{hurricane|class=B}}. This provides automatic categorization within Category:Tropical cyclone articles by quality. Note that the class parameter is case-specific; see the template's documentation for more information.

B-Class criteriaEdit

In addition to the above, B-Class articles for the WikiProject should meet the following six criteria:

  B 
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.
    It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of either <ref> tags or citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
    It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure.
    Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written.
    The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
    Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.
    It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

Assessment guidelinesEdit

Assessment guidelines for single tropical cyclone ("storm") articles:
Class Description Example
  FA Exemplifies the quality of a professional encyclopedia and passes featured article candidacy by satisfying the featured article criteria. Cyclone Raja
(as of May 2019)
  A Passes A-Class review. A-class storm articles are ready for submission as a featured article candidate, with only minor style issues, if any. A-class storm articles are comprehensive and clear in their prose and coverage, detailing all aspects of the storm with reliable sources, well-formatted CS1-templated references, relevant images, and non-breaking spaces where appropriate. WikiProject Tropical cyclone's A-class articles are considered higher quality than GA-class articles and are distinguished by their thoroughness in coverage, better style/prose, and consistency in references. A-class storm articles are essentially complete in their coverage of the storm. Hurricane Arthur
(as of June 2015)
  GA Nominated and passes Good article nominations. Touches and expounds upon all facets of the storm, including a meteorological history based upon the most reliable and final data (should use post-storm review data rather than operational data), unit system conversions for all measurements, and detailed storm preparations, impacts, and aftermath if available for all areas affected. All content is well-sourced with verifiable and reliable sources, and there should be no obvious omissions of pertinent content. Cyclone Sagar
(as of January 2019)
  B Passes all six B-Class criteria. B-class storm articles are fully-referenced, reasonably well-written, and cover the meteorological history of the storm and impacts for all areas affected. All sections, including the lede, should be well-structured and well-sourced. B-class articles should be free of any significant article-wide or section-wide citation and verifiability messages. However, there may be some minor omissions of certain facets of the storm and/or its impacts. Certain statements may also be dubious, ambiguous, unclear, or based on an original synthesis of ideas, even if those statements are well-sourced. Tropical Storm Rolf
(as of May 2019)
  C C-Class storm articles typically have most of the content and structure needed for a tropical cyclone storm article. Most new tropical cyclone storm articles that follow the project's style guidelines and are mostly well-referenced are preliminarily rated C-Class. However, C-Class articles often require extensive cleanup. They may place undue weight on certain facets of the storm, rely on outdated information (particularly in the meteorological history and casualty/damage figures), suggest subtle original research, cite broken links, feature some stretches of unencyclopedic prose, or contain unreferenced statements. C-Class articles touch upon all facets of a storm and all areas affected, but lack detail about these facets. Typhoon Haiyan
(as of July 2019)
  Start Start-Class articles are generally incomplete in their coverage of the storm. While it may meet most of the project's style guidelines and follow the basic layout for a tropical cyclone article, there may be missing information of pertinent content relating to the storm. The main affected areas and aspects of the storm's evolution may not be covered in adequate detail, while other secondarily affected areas may be missing entirely. Storm articles whose prose and depth of content do not reflect (or "do justice to") the notability of a storm or the severity of its impacts are often rated Start-class. Extensive cleanup is needed to bring these articles to par, and there are likely several sentences that are not referenced by reliable and verifiable sources. References are often bare links, and the tone of the article may not comply with the manual of style. However, Start-Class articles offer a more inclusive overview of the storm and at the very least acknowledge the entirety of the storm's scope. Tropical Storm Norma (1970)
(as of January 2012)
  Stub Stub-Class storm articles are largely devoid of most content, and may not follow the structure detailed in the project's style guidelines. Such articles provide some semblance of coverage and overview but are greatly lacking in detail. Entire sections of content may be unreferenced, or cited using questionable and non-verifiable sources. The principal aspects of the storm and basic sections specified in the project's guidelines, including the storm's basic meteorological history and main areas affected, may be wholly inadequate or entirely missing. Stub-Class storm articles are often jumbled collections of information that may not have much coherence establishing their relevance. Typhoon Sanba
(as of March 2013)

The following are assessment guidelines for season articles:

  • Stub class — Lacking the inclusion of each named (or nameable) storm
  • Start class — Every storm is mentioned
  • B class — Every storm has at least one paragraph for storm history and one for impact (if impact exists)
  • GA class — Covers everything well; before nominating, should include metric units, inline sourcing, and multiple paragraphs outside of the storm section (either in lede or a season summary section); nominated at WP:GAC and passed
  • A class — Season summary as well as an appropriately-long lead (two or more paragraphs, minimum), every section complete, any records about the season mentioned, non-breaking spacing (&nbsp;) between numbers and their units
  • FA class — Passes FAC

Assessment processEdit

Current practice is that Stub-Start-C-B assessments are done by individual editors when looking at an article. While usually it only takes a short time for assessors to identify new articles in Category:Unassessed Tropical cyclone articles, editors can request a review here if it is taking too long to assess an article.

Before upgrading articles to {{A-Class}}, the article should be discussed here to make sure everyone agrees that it meets the criteria listed above. This process is called an "A-Class review". To create a new A-Class review discussion, add the article to be assessed in a sub-section of the #A-Class review section below. Give the article's exact name in the title with a wikilink. Finally, add the "assessed=yes" parameter to the {{hurricane}} template near the talk of the article's talk page. Don't bundle more than one article per section, as that causes "assessed=yes" to point to a dead link.

Once the article is A-Class, you should probably get general peer review on it and then follow the normal process for promoting the article to featured status. Peer review (PR) and FA candidates (FAC) should be announced here to get more tropical-cyclone-specific comments from WPTC editors.

Finally, to prevent the page from becoming too long, archive an assessment discussion using the following form (replacing PAGENAME with the name of the article to archive):


Article assessmentsEdit

Today's featured articles

Articles for deletion

Proposed deletions

Featured article candidates

A-Class review

Good article nominees

Good article reassessments

If you want an editor to quickly assess a newly-created article, list it here below. Reviewers: If you review an article in here, go ahead and remove it from the list.


A candidate.svg A-Class Review A candidate.svg
Edit

If you don't find a storm, and its talk page marks it as assessed, look for it in the archives. Please add new assessments to the TOP of this list.

Tropical Storm Fern (1996)Edit

Nominator(s):  Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've done an ACR like this (it didn't go well last time). Let's see how it goes. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Closing this, has been stale for some time.  Nova Crystallis (Talk) 22:56, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Vicente (2018)Edit

Nominator(s): NoahTalk 18:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Asking for an A-class review for this article. I would like to eventually take this to FAC. NoahTalk 18:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

  • "was an unusually small tropical cyclone" - you never mention the storm size directly, so how do we know what's usual for a TC size?
  • Mentioned size with the extent of peak winds in the met. NoahTalk 15:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "The twenty-first named storm" - why not write it as a number?
  • Eh... I think it looks more professional when written out this way rather than 21st. NoahTalk 15:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "A brief break from the dry air during the next day allowed the storm to recuperate and slightly strengthen before outflow from the nearby Hurricane Willa caused further weakening. " - that's a lot
  • Split. NoahTalk 15:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • What was the peak rainfall?
  • Added that. NoahTalk 15:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "The heavy rainfall caused numerous rivers to spill their banks, dozens of landslides to occur, and severe flooding to ensue elsewhere." - grammar is off
  • Im not seeing what's wrong with it. NoahTalk 15:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Plan DN-III-E was activated in multiple states to provide aid to a large number of affected individuals" - why not write in the lead how many people were affected
  • Cut the mention of number since I have no idea how many in total were affected by the storm or how much the aid would cover. NoahTalk 19:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Maybe mention somewhere that convection = thunderstorms?
  • Mentioned. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Maybe mention that the NHC didn't anticipate development due to the system's small size and nearby presence of Willa?
  • Mentioned it right after formation and before mention of the environment. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "The depression was upgraded into Tropical Storm Vicente around 18:00 UTC" - that's the first time reference this paragraph
  • Dont think this applies anymore given the reorganization of the met. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Throughout the majority of the day, October 19, the system was less than 115 mi (185 km) off the coast of Guatemala while it inched towards the northwest." - that's kinda weird (bold part). It'd be more useful to know how close it was, not just "less than 115 mi"
  • Cut the of the day part. I think the fact that it was so close for so long is more important than a slightly closer point. Keep in mind that I do mention it being only 90 mi away when it formed into a TD. I dont see the need to mention anything closer than that when it was very close to the coast for the entire day. NoahTalk 19:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "was located less than 115 mi (185 km) off the coast of Chiapas and Oaxaca, Mexico" - was located less than 115 mi off the Mexican coast, off the states of Chiapas and Oaxaca" - just a suggested rewording
  • That wording seems a bit odd to me. NoahTalk 19:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "An overall green alert" - is "overall" redundant?
  • Im not the one that came up with the warning system. They refer to it in that manner. NoahTalk 19:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Rainfall totals of 6.21 in (157.7 mm) and 5.31 in (134.8 mm) were recorded in Zihuatanejo, Guerrero" - two rainfall totals for the same location?
  • I believe they were recorded by different companies/organizations. I felt it useful to list both since there were few rainfall totals given. NoahTalk 19:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Residents were evacuated from the Jacarandas neighborhood by state officials and police officers after a gasoline leak occurred." - was the leak related to the storm?
  • clarified that. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "The Rio Grande river overflowed and drainage systems were completely filled throughout the Morelia municipality." - Rio Grande = Big River in Spanish, so that reads "The Big River River". Also, add a comma
  • Done. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Ventura Puente, Carlos Salazar, Jacarandas, Los Manantiales, and Industrial experienced flooding up to 1 m (3.3 ft) deep"- are these neighborhoods of Morelia? If so, add that to the earlier bit when you mention the 27 neighborhoods being flooded
  • fixed that. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "The heavy rainfall also caused the ground to give way near Atapaneo" - so a landslide?
  • Yeah, but the phrase clearly means collapse and I don't want to include another instance of landslide given its usage later on. From pictures, it didn't look like it was that much anyways. It seemed to be just enough to break the track and cause the train to derail. NoahTalk 20:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "A storm drainage ditch that empties into the Chahué Bay overflowed" - wording could be stronger
  • Fixed? NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Part of the drainage ditch collapsed and a sinkhole developed on a bridge." - the drainage part should be in the previous sentence. Also, if a bridge is over water, how can a sinkhole occur on a bridge?
  • Added via semicolon. I dont know whether the collapse caused flooding so I cant use "and" to connect the two. Don't ask how sinkholes can occur on bridges. I really don't know how they do and numerous English sources have reported sinkholes on bridges. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Twenty-one communities were left without any outside communication as a result of severe floods" - are these the same 21 you mentioned being isolated earlier?
  • Cut the first mention and left the more detailed one. NoahTalk 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "In the Santa Cruz de Tuxtepec neighborhood, affected individuals were removing mud from their homes after river flooding decreased." - wouldn't residents affected by floods be doing the same elsewhere in the state?
  • Removed that. NoahTalk 21:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "A fence collapsed in Santiago Jamiltepec, resulting in several homes being inundated by floodwaters." - how does a fence collapsing = flooding?
  • Translation error. NoahTalk 21:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • "Fringe effects from the storm triggered flooding in Veracruz, leaving three people dead." - can you be clearer what these fringe effects are? Like, did it rain in the state?
  • Changed to rainfall NoahTalk 21:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • " In the Álamo-temapache municipality, the Green stream " - I'm guessing this is because of translation, but for water and land features, we should use the original language
  • Fixed. NoahTalk 21:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

All in all a pretty good article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink: Everything should be addressed. NoahTalk 21:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I'm happy to support for A-class! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Cyclone Leon–ElineEdit

Nominator(s): ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure if the article is in decent shape for FAC, or if I should focus on the sub-articles for Madagascar and Mozambique floods. If the latter is needed, then I'll archive this ACR. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Effects of Hurricane Wilma in MexicoEdit

Archived per the FAC nomination. NoahTalk 19:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominator(s): ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

I hope to get Wilma to be a featured topic by its 15 year anniversary. I recently finished this article, so I think it is pretty polished, and would like a fresh set of eyes. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink: Since you are taking this to FAC, do you want to close this review for now? Nova Crystallis (Talk) 08:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hurricane Gordon (1994)Edit

Nominator(s): ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

It's a shame I didn't do this last year for its 25 year anniversary, oh well. It's still a significant storm, and I put a lot of work into this article. There's probably some dumb fixes I need to do, since it's on the older side, so I'd appreciate a fresh set of eyes. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Hurricane Hector (2018) A-class reviewEdit

Nominator(s): NoahTalk 22:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

If possible, I need someone who would be willing to review four articles for A-class over an unknown time period. Please note that Hector and Walaka both did not receive comprehensive good article reviews (I was a new user when they were just passed without much of a review). Hence the reason why I have completely rewritten Hector and am beginning to rewrite Walaka. NoahTalk 22:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


Symbol unsupport A vote.svg A-Class Removal Candidate Symbol unsupport A vote.svg
Edit

Assessment logEdit

A bot-maintained log of all assessment changes of WP:WPTC articles can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment Log.

See alsoEdit