Talk:Tropical Storm Nicholas (2003)

Track map

Well, don't you think it is better to show the whole track of Nicholas instead of cutting off a bit of the extratropical part?????? The track in that part is quite interesting to show in full. That's what I think anyway. RaNdOm26 15:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Probably right.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, good luck with that. RaNdOm26 16:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Todo

Alright, I just finished redoing the article. What more is needed for B class? Hurricanehink (talk) 16:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Meh, provide a link for "wind shear" and "convection" in the intro. Also, I think the headings should be "Storm history", and "Impact, records and naming" (only the first letter is capitalised). LOL RaNdOm26 16:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

For Reference #21, you cannot cite Wikipedia as a source. Maybe have a look at WP:RS#Using Wikipedia as a source, though I am not sure how it really works. RaNdOm26 16:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm only showing where I got the ACE stuff. Mainly it's there to show the other ACE's. I tried linking ACE by storm, but I couldn't fit into the article, so I ref'd it. Most importantly, though, I linked the best track, which is where all the ACE stuff comes from. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

GA passed

As of 9 November 2006, per WP:WIAGA, this article passed for Good Article status. It's a nice small article with well-written crisp prose. It is also well-referenced and well-illustrated. Thank you for the editors for such a wonderful work. — Indon (reply) — 22:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have added an article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tropical Storm Sebastien (1995) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 04:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 30 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

---

Tropical Storm Nicholas (2003) → Tropical Storm Nicholas – Only Atlantic storm named Nicholas. Jdcomix (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 21:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose. Nomination failed to take into consideration the disambiguation page at Tropical Storm Nicholas, which would also need to be moved if this proposal passes. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

I misinterpreted the proposal; the disambiguation page would be deleted. As my opposition was purely procedural, I'll go ahead and make the move. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)}}

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.