Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 5 March 7 >

March 6 edit

Template:Saltillocap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 13. Izno (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CA Bastia squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused squad template for a French football team. CA Bastia was merged into FC Bastia-Borgo and {{FC Bastia-Borgo squad}} covers the new team. Nigej (talk) 07:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CIFSSTopScorers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CIF Southern Section Basketball Top Career Scorers. CIF Southern Section exists but no specific basketball content. Little prospect of being used. Nigej (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COI-thanks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard message relating to WP:COI. Can't see any point in it, especially since hardly anyone knows it exists. I'd have thought a short personal message was better, if required. Nigej (talk) 07:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COTW Arena Football League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Arena is defunct, so these won't be required again. Nigej (talk) 08:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CS Luceafărul Oradea squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused roster for a Romanian football team playing in Liga III. The roster is at CS Luceafărul Oradea but doesn't contain a single blue link. Nigej (talk) 08:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CTrain ridership edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused "ridership" data from 2007 for Calgary CTrain system. Nigej (talk) 08:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CWC Advert edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal related to the 2007 Cricket World Cup. Won't be required again. Nigej (talk) 08:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cabinet of Joe Biden edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox which is already at Cabinet of Joe Biden, so this won't be required. Nigej (talk) 08:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada National Football Junior Team roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2012 roster and staff for the Canada national junior football team. Not used at that article and seems too much detail for this level. Suggest deletion. Nigej (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Capitals in Africa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to respective duplicates. ✗plicit 11:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navboxes. Duplicates of {{List of African capitals}}, {{List of Asian capitals by region}} and {{List of European capitals by region}} which are used. Nigej (talk) 08:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carnaval edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox from 2008. {{Carnival around the world}} covers the area. Nigej (talk) 08:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Intercontinental Cup (India) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox with no links. May relate to 2017 Hero Tri-Nation Series (football) but not instantly obvious. Nigej (talk) 09:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I have revised the template to include the two tournaments that did happen until 2020 was pushed back. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 11:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The issue then is whether a navbox with just 2 articles is useful. Nigej (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 22:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - only links between 3 articles, including parent, not needed. GiantSnowman 22:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chanel West Coast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox for Chanel West Coast, "an American television personality, rapper, and singer." Nigej (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Château-Salins communes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 13. ✗plicit 11:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cities and towns in Osterode (district) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox for the former Osterode (district), now covered by other district. As a result {{Cities and towns in Göttingen (district)}} etc are used instead. Nigej (talk) 09:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clandestine Revelation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox for "an American Blackened Death Metal band" with no links in mainspace. Nigej (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:College football coach by team category header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. ✗plicit 11:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Header from 2011, only used at Category:Michigan Wolverines football coaches. Category:College football coaches in the United States has a similar description and that is perhaps sufficient to cover the 1000-odd categories in this area. Nigej (talk) 09:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy to my user space. This was an experiment of sports I threw out there to standardize descriptions for this class of categories, but never rolled out widely. Happy to take out of the published space for now and, perhaps, reintroduce the idea at later date for discussion. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:College of Herbal Physicians Pakistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced article content but there is no article on this topic. Suggest deletion. Nigej (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colleges affiliated to King George's Medical University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox that was used at these colleges but has been removed with comments like "now affiliated with Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University". Nigej (talk) 09:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Commercial Resupply Services missions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox covered by {{SpaceX Dragon}} etc. Too many navboxes just causes confusion for the reader anyway. Nigej (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of macronutrients in common foods edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article content from 2012. Unused except in creator's sandbox. Creator has been inactive since 2016. Nigej (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of preferential voting systems edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from 2016. Seems too similar to {{Comparison of Schulze to preferential voting systems}} to be usable. Nigej (talk) 10:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Computerdogs517 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{Southern Jiangsu transit}}. Nigej (talk) 11:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Concentric Software edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox with no real content to link between. Nigej (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Constituencies in Eastern England 1918-1945 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox, one unused, the other with 5 transclusions. Nearly always this style is a bad choice for a navbox. The bottom of articles get clogged up with whole series of these. Nigej (talk) 11:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Short description/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not used on Template:Short description. Gonnym (talk) 11:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Contract bridge articles by quality and importance edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken from 2011. Wikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridge/Assessment has a working system. Nigej (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Contract bridge grading scheme edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use at Wikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridge/Assessment. No reason for this to be in template space. Nigej (talk) 11:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Meta color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A remnant of the old meta system. Usages should be replaced with Template:Party color cell without leaving a redirect and with the following updates:

  • |1= unchanged.
  • |2= add "px" as that is what the Template:Meta color has hardcoded. While converting this take care to not add "px" to a width that already has this.
  • |3= seems to only be used in one userpage. Values should just be removed. Gonnym (talk) 12:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cooperatives task force assessment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relate to the inactive Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperatives. Nigej (talk) 14:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CornellCollaboration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to the inactive Wikipedia:WikiProject Cornell University. Nigej (talk) 14:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and won't be used. Gonnym (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Council of Ministers Government of Tamil Nadu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long out-of-date and unused list of Tamil Nadu Council of Ministers. Nigej (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonbar/Property edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was a WikiTable helper template long since superseded by Module:Taxonbar/confdoc in April 2018.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  17:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Passer rating edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates to calculates a passer rating (American football). NFL and college. Nigej (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brahmi-Gupta-Tocharian edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table. See the similar Tocharian script#Evolution from Brahmi to Tocharian. Nigej (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Datecnum edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template to sort dates. I'd have thought that {{dts}} would be preferred. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I don't understand the choice of numbers, why not just calculate the unix epoch time or Julian date? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete there are other better ways to do this, like just concatenating the formatted yyyymmdd string of digits -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editing Friday Chosen edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to the short-lived Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Editing Fridays from 2011. Marked as historical per a previous TfD in 2015, but based on recent TfD there's no reason to keep it. Nigej (talk) 20:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Connected contributor/refactored edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2015. See this talk page section, which is the only incoming link to this template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as creator. If nobody saw fit to comment on it then or since, I have no need to keep it around. DMacks (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_6&oldid=1076973796"